Reasons for participating and not participating in a e-health workplace physical activity intervention

Author:

Bardus Marco,Blake Holly,Lloyd Scott,Suzanne Suggs L.

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the reasons for participating and not participating in an e-health workplace physical activity (PA) intervention. Design/methodology/approach – Semi-structured interviews and two focus groups were conducted with a purposive sample of employees who enrolled and participated in the intervention and with those who did not complete enrolment, hence did not participate in it. Data were examined using thematic analysis according to the clusters of “reasons for participation” and for “non-participation”. Findings – Reported reasons for participation included a need to be more active, to increase motivation to engage in PA, and to better manage weight. Employees were attracted by the perceived ease of use of the programme and by the promise of receiving reminders. Many felt encouraged to enrol by managers or peers. Reported reasons for non-participation included lack of time, loss of interest towards the programme, or a lack of reminders to complete enrolment. Practical implications – Future e-health workplace behavioural interventions should consider focusing on employees’ needs and motivators to behaviour change, provide regular reminders for participants to complete enrolment and ensure that procedures are completed successfully. Barriers to participation could be identified through formative research with the target population and feasibility studies. Originality/value – This study combines a qualitative analysis of the reasons why some employees decided to enrol in a workplace PA intervention and why some others did not. This study highlights factors to consider when designing, implementing and promoting similar interventions and that could inform strategies to enhance participation in workplace PA interventions.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference49 articles.

1. Abraham, C. and Graham-Rowe, E. (2009), “Are worksite interventions effective in increasing physical activity? A systematic review and meta-analysis”, Health Psychology Review, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 108-144.

2. Ajzen, I. (1991), “The theory of planned behavior”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50 No. 2, pp. 179-211.

3. Bennett, G.G. and Glasgow, R.E. (2009), “The delivery of public health interventions via the internet: actualizing their potential”, Annual Review of Public Health, Vol. 30, pp. 273-292, doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100235.

4. Blake, H. and Lloyd, S. (2008), “Influencing organisational change in the NHS: lessons learned from workplace wellness initiatives in practice”, Quality in Primary Care, Vol. 16 No. 6, pp. 449-455.

5. Bull, F.C. , Adams, E.J. and Hooper, P.L. (2008), Well@Work: Promoting Active and Healthy Workplaces Final Evaluation Report, School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, available at: www.bhfactive.org.uk/downloads/W@W_EVALUATION_REPORT.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3