Performance outcomes and success factors of vendor managed inventory (VMI)

Author:

Claassen Marloes J.T.,van Weele Arjan J.,van Raaij Erik M.

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to seek to investigate performance outcomes of vendor managed inventory (VMI) from a buyer's perspective and enablers for its successful application.Design/methodology/approachStructural equation modelling through Partial Least Squares (PLS) is used to identify relationships between four enablers (information systems, information sharing, information quality, and relationship quality), perceived VMI success, and three outcomes (cost reductions, customer service, and supply chain control).FindingsBuyer‐perceived VMI success is impacted by the quality of the buyer‐supplier relationship, the quality of the IT‐system and the intensity of information sharing, but not by the actual quality of the information shared. Furthermore, VMI leads to three performance outcomes: higher customer service levels, improved supply chain control and, to a lesser extent, cost reduction.Research limitations/implicationsAlthough theory stipulates a positive impact of high quality information on the success of VMI, this study shows that the effect of information quality is limited in practice.Practical implicationsThe results of the survey show that purchasing managers who invest in the relationship with their suppliers and a good IT infrastructure are more likely to get better results from a VMI implementation. Furthermore, this paper shows that while most managers expect major cost reductions when implementing VMI, benefits primarily come from improved service levels.Originality/valueThe study provides empirical evidence of why VMI in practice does not achieve all the benefits claimed in theory.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference46 articles.

1. Aichlmayr, M. (2000), “DC mart: who manages inventory in a value chain?”, Transportation and Distribution, Vol. 41 No. 10, pp. 60‐4.

2. Angulo, A., Nachtmann, H. and Waller, M.A. (2004), “Supply chain information sharing in a vendor managed inventory partnership”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 101‐20.

3. Barclay, D., Higgins, C. and Thompson, R. (1995), “The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: personal computer adoption and use as an illustration”, Technology Studies, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 285‐309.

4. Barratt, M. (2004a), “Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 30‐42.

5. Barratt, M. (2004b), “Unveiling enablers and inhibitors of collaborative planning”, International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 73‐90.

Cited by 121 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3