Author:
Christensen William J.,Germain Richard N.,Birou Laura
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of supply chain lead‐time averages and variability on an organization's financial performance.Design/methodology/approachThe “executive” list for manufacturers, consisting of 1,264 individuals of the Institute of Supply Management provided the study's sampling frame, with surveys sent to 402 firms and responses obtained from 210 firms. The empirical model is tested using LISREL.FindingsThe results show that as variance in supply chain lead‐times increases, the financial performance of the organization decreases. Of equal significance, the results show that average supply chain lead‐times have no direct impact on financial performance. The results also indicate that demand uncertainty associates with greater supply chain lead‐time variance and that production technology routineness associates with lower supply chain lead‐time variance. Product complexity and organizational size have no impact on supply chain lead‐time variance or supply chain lead‐time average.Research limitations/implicationsThe research is an initial effort to understand variance in supply chain systems. An ongoing challenge in this area is operationalization of measures and data collection techniques that go beyond a single firm and examine a network of organizations cooperating in a value‐added supply chain.Practical implicationsThe results suggest that managing the variance in a supply chain system may be more important to an organization's financial performance than managing averages.Originality/valueThis is particularly significant since organizations often act contrary to these findings, focusing scarce resources on reducing average lead‐times rather than on reducing variability in supply chain lead‐times.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference32 articles.
1. Anderson, E. (1985), “The salesperson as outside agent or employee: a transaction cost analysis”, Marketing Science, Vol. 4, Summer, pp. 234‐54.
2. Birou, L. (1993), “The role of the buyer‐supplier linkage in an integrated product development environment”, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
3. Birou, L.M. and Fawcett, S.E. (1993), “Just‐in‐time sourcing techniques: current state of adoption and performance benefits”, Production and Inventory Management Journal, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 18‐24.
4. Blau, P.M. (1970), “A formal theory of differentiation in organizations”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 35, April, pp. 201‐18.
5. Celly, K.S. and Frazier, G. (1996), “Outcome‐based and behavior‐based coordination efforts in channel relationships”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 200‐10.
Cited by
43 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献