Abstract
Argues that the existing supply chain literature provides no explanation for the role of intermediation and intermediaries and may even be said to predict their demise. This claim is made on the basis of two assumptions derived from the literature, namely that intermediation reduces supply chain transparency and adds cost but not value. Observes, however, that intermediation is an important component in many international clothing supply chains and outlines an explanatory framework that focuses on information costs. The principal sources of information costs in international markets for clothing are then identified and, finally, a case study is presented to provide empirical illustration of the preceding arguments, demonstrating the explanatory power of the theory advanced.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference12 articles.
1. Aquilon, M. (1997), “Cultural dimensions in logistics management: a case study from the European automotive industry”, Supply Chain Management, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 76‐87.
2. Boddy, D., Cahill, C., Charles, M., Fraser‐Kraus, H. and Macbeth, D. (1998), “Success and failure in implementing supply chain partnering: an empirical study”, European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 4, pp. 143‐51.
3. Casson, M. (1997a), Information and Economic Organization: A New Perspective on the Theory of the Firm, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
4. Casson, M. (1997b), “Institutional economics and business history: a way forward?”, Business History, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 151‐71.
5. Cox, A. (1999), “A research agenda for supply chain and business management thinking”, Supply Chain Management, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 209‐11.
Cited by
67 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献