KPIs for facility's performance assessment, Part I: identification and categorization of core indicators

Author:

Lavy Sarel,A. Garcia John,K. Dixit Manish

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to synthesize the previously established list of key performance indicators (KPIs), to identify and categorize the core performance indicators that are measurable and quantifiable. Design/methodology/approach – A literature-based qualitative approach is adopted for accumulating desired information on identifying and categorizing the core indicators. The list of KPIs established in an earlier paper is narrowed down considering the future research needs suggested by the literature. Findings – The quantifiable and measurable core indicators are identified and categorized in the form of a list. The core indicators are defined and the variables required to quantify them are described by citing peer-reviewed literature. Research limitations/implications – This paper represents the first step toward establishing a relevant list of quantifiable and measurable core KPIs. Future research papers could emphasize derivation of mathematical expressions for determining the identified core KPIs and validating these KPIs using simulation of real building data. Practical implications – The need to establish a concise and relevant list of quantifiable and measurable KPIs that could express more than one type of information about a facility's performance is identified in this paper. This paper presents and describes a narrowed down list of core KPIs, which could be utilized by facility management industry professionals while performing a holistic performance assessment. Originality/value – This paper provides a list of core KPIs that could express more than one aspect of a facility's performance and that is measurable and quantifiable.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Building and Construction,Architecture,Human Factors and Ergonomics

Reference105 articles.

1. Adams, T.M. and Smith, J. (2005), “Maintenance quality assurance – synthesis of measures”, Project 06-01, Midwest Regional University Transportation Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA.

2. Amaratunga, D. and Baldry, D. (2003), “A conceptual framework to measure facilities management performance”, Property Management, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 171-189.

3. Amaratunga, D. , Baldry, D. and Sarshar, M. (2000a), “Assessment of facilities management performance in higher education properties”, Facilities, Vol. 18 Nos 7/8, pp. 293-301.

4. Amaratunga, D. , Baldry, D. and Sarshar, M. (2000b), “Assessment of facilities management performance – what next?”, Facilities, Vol. 18 Nos 1/2, pp. 66-75.

5. APPA, FFC, HOLDER, IFMA, and NASFA (2003), “Asset lifecycle model for total cost of ownership management, framework, glossary & definitions”, available at: www.ifma.org/tools/research/Asset_Lifecyle_Model.pdf (accessed 25 February 2009).

Cited by 53 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3