Author:
Tiron-Tudor Adriana,Nistor Cristina Silvia,Stefanescu Cristina Alexandrina
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to approach, both theoretically and empirically, public sector reporting at European Union (EU) level. It contributes to the accounting harmonisation literature by revealing the actual status of governmental reporting at the national level.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper carried out an exploratory data analysis of the harmonisation of statistical, budgetary and financial reporting at the EU level. A mapping visualisation offers a comprehensive overview of the current state of connections between these reporting systems.
Findings
The results reveal the complexity of governments’ reporting systems homogeneity, although all stakeholders recognise the struggle for the principles of performance and transparency in the public sector. Thus, these are following the EU Commission’s study, which concludes that there is significant heterogeneity in the accounting and reporting practices applied transversely throughout all Member States.
Research limitations/implications
The relevance of the study is comprehensive, from the economic environment to the practitioners, from the international regulatory bodies to the national ones, all can assess and quantify the significance of the past, present and future changes, considering their needs. The limitations of the research regard the documentation background because uniformly accessing some information presented by the EU Member States is relatively tricky. Future research might focus on the effects of these changes as they occur.
Originality/value
The study contributes to the scientific literature in the public sector through a comprehensive, well-supported and statistically grounded analysis performed at EU level, able to provide reliable results and to support valuable future recommendations towards harmonised reporting. Moreover, it supports and encourages all national and international efforts for improving the comparability of financial, budgetary and aggregated statistical reports.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Political Science and International Relations,Public Administration,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference57 articles.
1. The magic shoes of IPSAS: will they fit Turkey?;Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences,2018
2. Adhikari, P. and Mellemvik, F. (2010), “The adoption of IPSASs in South Asia: a comparative study of seven countries”, in Tsamenyi, M. and Uddin, S. (Eds), Research in Accounting in Emerging Economies, Vol. 10, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 169-199.
3. Budgetary transparency in the European Union: the role of IPSAS;International Advances in Economic Research,2014
4. The harmonization of government financial information systems: the role of IPSASs;International Review of Administrative Sciences,2007
5. Biondi, Y. and Soverchia, M. (2014), “Accounting rules for the European communities: a theoretical analysis”, Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 1-36.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献