Author:
Ip W.H.,Chan S.L.,Lam C.Y.
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to propose an integrated approach to modeling and measuring supply chain performance and stability using system dynamics (SD) and the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA).Design/methodology/approachSD and ARIMA models were developed, respectively, for modeling and measuring supply chain performance and for further analyzing and projecting supply chain stability for long‐term management. A case study from a typical semiconductor equipment manufacturing company is used to illustrate and validate the proposed method.FindingsEffectiveness and efficiency, with six corresponding indicators (product reliability, employee fulfillment, customer fulfillment, on‐time delivery, profit growth, and working efficiency), were found to be the most significant factors in the performance of the supply chain. The results of the combined model provide evidence that supply chain performance of the case company is up to standard (average OPIN=0.64) and is considered stable, but still far from outstanding. Continuous improvement, especially in supply chain efficiency, is suggested in order to maximize performance.Originality/valueThis integrated approach is innovative and creates a new way for other disciplines. This study provides a practical and easy‐to‐use model that enables senior and top management decision makers and operation managers involved in the supply chain to assess, forecast, and take anticipatory action so that the supply chain can experience improvement in a timesaving and effective manner and achieve excellence in performance.
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Strategy and Management,Computer Science Applications,Industrial relations,Management Information Systems
Reference64 articles.
1. Agarwal, A. and Shankar, R. (2002), “Analyzing alternatives for improvement in supply chain performance”, Work Study, Vol. 51 No. 1, pp. 32‐7.
2. Akkermans, H. (2001), “Renga: a system approach to facilitating inter‐organizational network development”, System Dynamics Review, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 179‐93.
3. Beamon, B.M. (1996), “Performance measure in supply chain management”, Proceedings of the Agile and Intelligent Manufacturing Symposium, Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroy, NY, USA.
4. Beamon, B.M. (1999), “Measuring supply chain performance”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 275‐92.
5. Berrah, L. and Cliville, V. (2007), “Towards an aggregation performance measurement system model in a supply chain context”, Computers in Industry, Vol. 58 No. 7, pp. 709‐19.
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献