Organizational access in qualitative research

Author:

Alexander Benjamin NathanORCID,Smith Anne D.

Abstract

Purpose While organizational access is central to much qualitative research, little is known about how researchers secure it. The purpose of this paper is to provide a systematic assessment of this critical methodological step. Design/methodology/approach A systematic review was conducted to establish how researchers gained access to organizations for qualitative research. Access type was identified and explanatory indicators were inductively developed to illuminate how access was obtained in a sample of 216 qualitative articles published in Administrative Science Quarterly and Academy of Management Journal between 1986 and 2013. A supplemental review of 306 articles published in Organization Studies over the same period augmented the primary analysis with a broader view of published accounts of access. Findings Learning prior to entering organizations, researchers’ backgrounds, organizational insiders, and outside contacts facilitated access. The role of these factors, which served as indicators of legitimacy, varied with the type of access. In addition, the authors found that many articles provide little information about how the researchers gained access, regardless of a publication’s domicile. Originality/value This study furthers the understanding of how researchers gain access to organizations to conduct qualitative research and discusses the implications of the limited access accounts in published studies. In addition, this research provides practical guidance for authors, editors, and reviewers.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Business, Management and Accounting,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Reference132 articles.

1. Intense loyalty in organizations: a case study of college athletics;Administrative Science Quarterly,1988

2. First decade of organizational research methods;Organizational Research Methods,2009

3. Arriving at the starting line: the impact of community and financial logics on new banking ventures;Academy of Management Journal,2012

4. Outward bound: strategic for team survival in an organization;Academy of Management Journal,1990

5. Markets, morals, and practices of trade: jurisdictional disputes in the US commerce in cadavers;Administrative Science Quarterly,2010

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Strategies for Generating Deliberately Emergent Qualitative Research Designs;The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science;2024-02-29

2. Etnografia organizacional em um mundo permeado pela tecnologia digital;Revista Eletrônica de Ciência Administrativa;2023-06-13

3. “Your westernized habits”: contextual nuances of qualitative research in Russia;Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal;2021-05-17

4. Listed Family Firm Stakeholder Orientations: The Critical Role of Value-creating Family Factors;Journal of Family Business Strategy;2020-12

5. How Can Charities use Coaching to Develop Managers and Does the Charity Context Matter?;INT J EVID BASED COA;2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3