A global study on applicability of ISO 18404:2015 for SMEs: an exploratory qualitative study

Author:

Antony JijuORCID,Swarnakar Vikas,Salentijn WillemORCID,Shokri AlirezaORCID,Doulatabadi MehranORCID,Bhat ShreerangaORCID,McDermott OliviaORCID,Jayaraman RajaORCID,Sony Michael

Abstract

PurposeISO 18404:2015 standard defines the proficiencies to the attainment of distinct competency levels with either Lean Manufacturing or Six Sigma or separately combined strategy Lean Six Sigma (LSS). The purpose of this paper is to perform a detailed investigation of the applicability of current LSS competency standard in SMEs and examine the need for further improvement.Design/methodology/approachA qualitative-based semi-structured interview method was utilized globally by interviewing a group of LSS professionals with knowledge about the LSS implementation working in different leading organizations. All participants were asked to review the standard before the interview process to ensure that they are familiar with the standard.FindingsThe results reveal that the current ISO 18404:2015 standard does not fit SMEs to implement the LSS approach as it has several shortfalls that need to be fixed before its adoption or an urgent need to develop a more customized LSS standard for SMEs. The outcome further helps organizations understand theoretical knowledge about ISO 18404:2015, its role in operational excellence implementation, pros, cons, critical success factors and required changes for further improvement within the standard.Research limitations/implicationsThere were very limited baseline studies in the literature. A mixed method strategy that includes qualitative and quantitative data would yield better data so that more robust outcomes can be derived from the research.Originality/valueTo the best of authors' knowledge, this is the first empirical research on the applicability of ISO 18404:2015 for SMEs, which encapsulate opinions of LSS professionals working in several SMEs.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting,Business and International Management,General Decision Sciences

Reference50 articles.

1. Essential methodological considerations when using grounded theory;Nurse Researcher,2016

2. Some pros and cons of six sigma: an academic perspective;The TQM Magazine,2004

3. Critical assessment on the Six Sigma Black Belt roles/responsibilities, skills and training: a global empirical study;International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management,2016

4. A study into the pros and cons of ISO 18404: viewpoints from leading academics and practitioners;The TQM Journal,2021

5. Global study into the pros and cons of ISO 18404: a convergent mixed method study and recommendations for further research;International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management,2021

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3