The conflict between social role expectations and entrepreneurial role demands among women entrepreneurs in sub-Saharan Africa: empirical study from Ethiopia
Author:
Mulu Hundera,Duysters Geert,Naudé Wim,Dijkhuizen Josette
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to develop items for measuring the role conflict between social role expectations (SREs) and entrepreneurial role demands (ERDs) among women entrepreneurs in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).
Design/methodology/approach
This paper uses 20 interviews and literature from SSA to develop items, a survey of 408 to conduct factor analysis and a survey of 307 to conduct criterion validity analysis.
Findings
Statistical analysis shows that the scales used adequately captured two dimensions of SRE and ERD conflict: SRE-to-ERD conflict and ERD-to-SRE conflict. It was found that the SRE-to-ERD-conflict scale is reliable and valid with the five dimensions of entrepreneurial success and that women entrepreneur’s experience significant role conflict between SREs and ERDs.
Research limitations/implications
The implication is that standard scales measuring work and family conflict, which tend to focus solely on the work and family context, cannot adequately account for role conflict among women entrepreneurs.
Practical implications
The practical implications of these findings are discussed.
Originality/value
New scale items form measuring the conflict between SREs and ERDs were developed.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Gender Studies
Reference70 articles.
1. Social capital: prospects for a new concept;Academy of Management Review,2002
2. Direct and indirect effects of work-family conflict on job performance;The Journal of International Management Studies,2008
3. All in a day’s work: boundaries and micro role transitions;Academy of Management Review,2000
4. Family embeddedness and entrepreneurship experience: a study of Indian migrant women entrepreneurs in Australia;Entrepreneurship & Regional Development,2016
5. Recent developments in role theory;Annual Review of Sociology,1986