Abstract
PurposeA limited number of studies have aimed at understanding behavior towards animal welfare. However, there are indications that consumers make an important distinction between land animals and fish. As no studies have attempted to explain the factors that influence consumer behavior towards the welfare of fish, this study aims to explain the behavior using the value–belief–norm (VBN) model. In addition, we extend the model by using empathy as a factor influencing the formation of personal norms. This study argues that by adding empathy to the model, we will improve the ability of the VBN to explain moral behavior.Design/methodology/approachThe study is based on survey data from 416 Norwegian consumers. A structural equation modeling analysis with latent constructs is used to test the hypotheses.FindingsThe findings validate the ability of the VBN model to explain consumer intention to buy products containing fish with better welfare. We also showed that empathy and beliefs strongly influence personal norms. The extended VBN model increased the explained variance of personal norm by 11,54%. Consumers with biospheric values are strongly likely to have empathetic feelings towards fish suffering and believe that fish can feel pain. However, consumers with hedonistic values are significantly negatively related to beliefs and empathy.Practical implicationsBy understanding the role of empathy, companies can develop marketing strategies that appeal to consumers' values, empathy and beliefs and ultimately encourage them to make purchases that support fish welfare.Originality/valuePractically, this study explores consumers' beliefs towards fish welfare and identifies consumers who are more likely to purchase products containing fish with better welfare based on their values.
Reference63 articles.
1. Factors related to household energy use and intention to reduce it: the role of psychological and socio-demographic variables;Human Ecology Review,2011
2. Ajzen, I. (1985), “From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior”, in Action Control, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 11-39, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2.
3. The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections;Psychology and Health,2011
4. Consumers' concerns and perceptions of farm animal welfare;Animals,2020
5. The impact of animal welfare and environmental information on the choice of organic fish: an empirical investigation of German trout consumers;Marine Resource Economics,2019