Author:
Afrifa Godfred Adjappong,Tauringana Venancio
Abstract
Purpose
– This paper aims to report the results of an investigation into the effect of corporate governance factors on the performance of listed small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), and examines whether this effect differs between the two sizes of business.
Design/methodology/approach
– The paper uses unbalanced panel data regression analysis on a sample of 234 SMEs listed on the Alternative Investment Market, for a 10-year period (2004-2013).
Findings
– The panel data analysis results show that for all SMEs, corporate governance factors – board size, chief executive officer (CEO) age and tenure and directors’ remuneration – are significantly associated with performance of SMEs. The results also suggest that while board size is associated with the performance of both small and medium enterprises, CEO age is significant only for medium firms and directors’ remuneration only for small ones, while CEO tenure and proportion of non-executive directors are not significant for either.
Practical implications
– Overall, the results imply that corporate governance factors affect the performance of listed SMEs. However, this effect differs significantly between small and medium enterprises. The findings have important implications for policymakers who prescribe corporate governance mechanisms for SMEs.
Originality/value
– The paper adds to existing literature on corporate governance of SMEs by establishing a relationship between firm performance and board size, CEO age, CEO tenure, directors’ remuneration and proportion of non-executive directors.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference65 articles.
1. Afrifa, G.A.
(2013), “Working capital management and AIM listed SME companies’ profitability: a mixed research method approach”,
PhD. Dissertation
, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth.
2. Agrawal, A.
and
Knoeber, C.R.
(1996), “Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders”,
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 377-397.
3. Anderson, R.C.
and
Reeb, D.M.
(2004), “Board composition: balancing family influence in S
&
P 500 firms”,
Administrative Science Quarterly
, Vol. 49 No. 2, pp. 209-237.
4. Arnegger, M.
,
Hofmann, C.
,
Pull, K.
and
Vetter, K.
(2014), “Firm size and board diversity”,
Journal of Management & Governance
, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 1109-1135.
5. Avery, C.N.
and
Chevalier, J.
(1999), “Herding over the career”,
Economics Letters
, Vol. 53 No. 3, pp. 327-333.
Cited by
63 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献