Author:
Fiorentino Raffaele,Garzella Stefano
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to advance a conceptual comprehensive framework to analyze synergy management pitfalls in mergers and acquisitions (M
&
As). The framework highlights the main dimensions of synergy management, the most relevant synergy pitfalls and the ways to overcome them.
Design/methodology/approach
– A greater recognition of synergy management literature in M
&
As is developed. A framework is provided integrating the compatible elements of previous broad areas of research and the main findings of studies on several topics related to synergy.
Findings
– Prior literature has suggested that synergy is an important motivation of M
&
As, has tended to be overestimated and has been difficult to achieve. Specifically, there are three relevant synergy pitfalls: the “mirage,” a tendency to overestimate synergy potential, the “gravity hill,” the underestimation of the difficulties in synergy realization and “amnesia,” a dangerous lack of attention to the realization of synergy. An effective synergy management requires an analysis of five dimensions: the steps of the M
&
A process, the several values of synergy, the forbidding effects of poor synergy management, the potential causes of synergy inflation and the selection of solutions to synergy pitfalls.
Practical implications
– The comprehensive framework suggests insights and guidelines to help managers to overcome pitfalls in synergy management. Managers will learn the following lessons: “when” pitfalls should embrace synergy management; “where” pitfalls may occur; “why” pitfalls may occur; “what” consequences can result in a value of “realized synergy” lower than the “expected synergy”; and “how” actions, tools and behaviors can overcome hidden dangers in synergy management.
Originality/value
– The study changes the focus from a single, generic synergy trap to three more analytical, useful synergy pitfalls: the mirage, the gravity hill and the amnesia. By shedding light on synergy management pitfalls, this paper enriches M
&
A literature and enhance practical solutions to reduce pitfalls in synergy decision making.
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference205 articles.
1. Aaker, D.
(2001),
Strategic Market Management
, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.
2. Accenture
(2007),
Strategy in Action. The Synergy Enigma
, Accenture, available at: www.accenture.com (accessed 2008).
3. Agarwal, A.
and
Jaffe, J.F.
(2000), “The post-merger performance puzzle”, in
Cooper, C.
and
Gregory, A.
(Eds),
Advances in Mergers and Acquisitions
, No. 1, Elsevier Science, New York, NY, pp. 7-14.
4. Ahuja, G.
and
Katila, A.
(2001), “Technological acquisition and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study”,
Strategic Management Journal
, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 197-220.
5. Allred, B.B.
,
Boal, K.B.
and
Holstein, W.K.
(2005), “Corporations as stepfamilies: a new metaphor for explaining the fate of merged and acquired companies”,
Academy of Management Executive
, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 23-37.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献