Priorities and perceptions of corporate social responsibility
Author:
Skouloudis Antonis,Avlonitis George J.,Malesios Chrisovaladis,Evangelinos Konstantinos
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to inform the business management literature that focuses on the perceptions of business professionals towards the multidimensional and highly complex concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR).
Design/methodology/approach
– This study is based on a sample of 118 Greek business executives/middle managers having different functional positions. A questionnaire based on the works of Quazi and O’Brien (2000) and Welford et al. (2007) was designed and used for data collection.
Findings
– Key findings denote occupational health and safety, benign environmental management as well as responsible production methods as the top CSR priorities. Two different CSR viewpoints emerged from the factor analysis reflecting a pragmatic and a more socially responsive interpretation of corporate responsibility. Cluster analysis confirmed such contrasting perspectives allowing the partition of data in distinctive groups according to the relative inclination on either of the identified viewpoints. Similarity measures obtained from cluster analysis also verified the different CSR positions.
Originality/value
– The paper explores CSR perceptions, as predictor factors of CSR performance, in three different groups of Greek business professionals. It contributes to the literature of CSR perspectives from South-East European countries where there is a distinct lack of empirical studies on managerial attitudes.
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference109 articles.
1. Aguilera, R.V.
,
Rupp, D.E.
,
Williams, C.A.
and
Ganapathi, J.
(2007), “Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: a multilevel theory of social change in organizations”,
Academy of Management Review
, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 836-863. 2. Armstrong, R.W.
,
Stening, B.W.
,
Ryans, J.K.
,
Marks, L.
and
Mayo, M.
(1990), “International marketing ethics: problems encountered by Australian firms”,
European Journal of Marketing
, Vol. 25 No. 10, pp. 5-19. 3. Aupperle, K.E.
(1984), “An empirical measure of corporate social orientation”, in
Preston, L.E.
(Ed.),
Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy
, Vol. 6, JAI press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 27-54. 4. Backhaus, K.B.
,
Stone, B.
and
Heiner, K.
(2002), “Exploring the relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness”,
Business and Society
, Vol. 41 No. 3, pp. 292-318. 5. Becker, H.
and
Fritzsche, D.J.
(1987), “A comparison of the ethical behavior of American, French and German managers”,
Columbia Journal of World Business
, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 87-96.
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|