Abstract
PurposeEmpirical evidence suggests corporate culture and change contribute to every Lean failure. Whilst the prevailing research implies that successful Lean implementations lead to a profitable organisation, it also points towards the low numbers of organisations fully adopting the Lean principles. The purpose of this paper is to identify the existing prevalence of culture in explaining the low numbers (less than 10 per cent) of successful British manufacturing organisations that have fully adopted the concepts of Lean and to advocate preventative actions that organisations could pursue in order to improve the UK implementation records.Design/methodology/approachThe methodology predominantly used included survey questionnaires within 68 manufacturing organisations of various sizes and at differing stages of Lean; this was coupled with seven case studies and subsequently validated by an extensive Lean audit undertaken in 20 organisations.FindingsThis research initially deciphers the prevalence of culture to Lean failures and then proceeds to recommend courses of action to facilitate higher implementation rates. The significance of culture was evident. The results reveal that a triumphant implementation requires a systematic and controlled strategy to look at the prevailing culture. Whilst Lean failures are attributable to different causes; the fundamental issues of corporate culture and change is evident.Practical implicationsAny organisation embarking upon Lean needs to unequivocally address the prevailing cultural issues. For Lean to thrive, evidently the processes, appropriate application of tools and its application across the value chain would prove futile without a conducive culture.Originality/valuePossible remedial and preventative courses of action are advocated which should facilitate successful implementations. The implementation of Lean cannot be taken nonchalantly as there is a requirement for heavy investment in terms of both time and money. Nonetheless, when an organization pursues a conducive culture, the probability of success is improved, which secures the superior levels of performance.
Reference49 articles.
1. Angelis, J., Conti, R., Cooper, C. and Gill, C. (2011), “Building a high‐commitment Lean culture”, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 22, pp. 569‐586.
2. Atkinson, P. (2010), “Lean is a cultural issue”, Management Services, Vol. 54, pp. 35‐44.
3. Barley, S. (1983), “Semiotics and the study of occupational and organisational culture”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 28, pp. 393‐414.
4. Bateman, N. (2001), Sustainability, Lean Enterprise Research Centre Publication, Wales, pp. 2‐24, April.
5. Bicheno, J. and Holweg, M. (2009), The Lean Toolbox, Picsie, Buckingham.
Cited by
37 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Issues in the adoption of the scaled agile framework;Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice;2022-05-21
2. Issues in the Adoption of the Scaled Agile Framework;2022 IEEE/ACM 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP);2022-05
3. Impactos nos fatores psicossociais de lideranças em sistemas de produção enxuta;Sistemas & Gestão;2022-04-05
4. What factors are associated with improvements in productivity in clinical laboratories in the Asia Pacific Region?;Clinical Biochemistry;2022-01
5. Mechanical Engineering Students Project-Based Learning in OUAS;Training Engineering Students for Modern Technological Advancement;2022