Author:
Naslund Dag,Norrman Andreas
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to develop, implement, test and further enhance a framework for measuring organizational change initiatives.
Design/methodology/approach
The conceptual part of the framework is based on the structured analysis of existing literature. The framework was further developed during an action research (AR) study where the authors developed, implemented, evaluated and improved the measurement system for organizational change initiatives.
Findings
The academic literature is rich in conceptual articles providing required characteristics of a “good” measurement system and frameworks for how organizations should measure performance. However, academia provides less empirical evidence of how these performance measurement systems can be implemented, evaluated and improved. In this paper, the authors present a study where the developed measurement system has been implemented, evaluated and improved. The results in terms of how the actual framework worked as well as the response from the case organizations are equally positive.
Research limitations/implications
The framework has been implemented in two different, major change initiatives in one case organization. While the results are truly encouraging, the framework needs to be further tested and refined in more organizations.
Practical implications
There is a gap between academic perception and practical reality regarding how organizations should measure performance in general as well as measuring organizational change initiatives. The presented, and empirically tested, framework measures both the results of the change initiative (effectiveness) the actual change process (efficiency) as well as the perception of the change initiative and process from different key stakeholders.
Originality/value
This is the first developed, implemented and further improved measurement system for organizational change which measures both the efficiency and effectiveness of the change initiative (process).
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Business and International Management
Reference106 articles.
1. Leadership studies: from procedure and abstraction to reflexivity and situation;Leadership Quarterly,1996
2. Social theory for action: how individuals and organizations learn to change;Industrial and Labour Relations Review,1993
3. Armenakis, A., Harris, S. and Feild, H. (1999), “Paradigms in organizational change: change agent and change target perspectives”, in Golembiewski, R. (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior, 2nd ed., Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, pp. 631-658.
4. Organizational change recipients’ beliefs scale. Development of an assessment instrument;The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,2007
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献