“Constructing the users” in open source software development

Author:

Iivari Netta

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to report findings from an interpretive case study on user participation in the open source software (OSS) development context.Design/methodology/approachThrough an empirical, interpretive case study and a literature review utilising the metaphor of text in the analysis, this paper provides a refined conceptualisation of user participation in OSS development.FindingsThe paper reveals that different kinds of meanings have been attached to users and to their participation. User participation is both direct and indirect in the OSS development context. Some user groups actively take part in OSS development, while others are merely represented in it. Different kinds of intermediaries “representing the users” are identified.Research limitations/implicationsThe research is based on one case study on a small but active OSS project with an interest in users. Other kinds of OSS projects should be analysed. The analysis was focused on a discussion forum, but users can take part in OSS development by other means as well. Paths for future work should include the gathering of more varied empirical data.Practical implicationsThe findings indicate that users can provide feedback to the development through discussion forums in the distributed environment, but there is a need to support the users in doing so and the developers in analysing the data. The importance of different kinds of intermediaries “representing the users” is highlighted.Originality/valueThe paper provides thorough empirical insights and a refined conceptualisation of user participation addressing the currently weakly empirically explored OSS development context.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,Information Systems

Reference50 articles.

1. Akrich, M. (1992), “The de‐scription of technical objects”, in Bijker, W.E. and Law, J. (Eds), Shaping Technology/Building Society, Studies in Sociotechnical Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 205‐24.

2. Andreasen, M., Nielsen, H., Schrøder, S. and Stage, J. (2006), “Usability in open source software development: opinions and practice”, Information Technology and Control, Vol. 25 No. 3A, pp. 303‐12.

3. Asaro, P. (2000), “Transforming society by transforming technology: the science and politics of participatory design”, Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, Vol. 10, pp. 257‐90.

4. Benson, C., Müller‐Prove, M. and Mzourek, J. (2004), “Professional usability in open source projects: GNOME, OpenOffice.org, NetBeans”, Extended Abstracts of CHI 2004, ACM, New York, NY, pp. 1083‐4.

5. Bjerknes, G. and Bratteteig, T. (1995), “User participation and democracy. A discussion of Scandinavian research on system development”, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 73‐98.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3