Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to report findings from an interpretive case study on user participation in the open source software (OSS) development context.Design/methodology/approachThrough an empirical, interpretive case study and a literature review utilising the metaphor of text in the analysis, this paper provides a refined conceptualisation of user participation in OSS development.FindingsThe paper reveals that different kinds of meanings have been attached to users and to their participation. User participation is both direct and indirect in the OSS development context. Some user groups actively take part in OSS development, while others are merely represented in it. Different kinds of intermediaries “representing the users” are identified.Research limitations/implicationsThe research is based on one case study on a small but active OSS project with an interest in users. Other kinds of OSS projects should be analysed. The analysis was focused on a discussion forum, but users can take part in OSS development by other means as well. Paths for future work should include the gathering of more varied empirical data.Practical implicationsThe findings indicate that users can provide feedback to the development through discussion forums in the distributed environment, but there is a need to support the users in doing so and the developers in analysing the data. The importance of different kinds of intermediaries “representing the users” is highlighted.Originality/valueThe paper provides thorough empirical insights and a refined conceptualisation of user participation addressing the currently weakly empirically explored OSS development context.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,Information Systems
Reference50 articles.
1. Akrich, M. (1992), “The de‐scription of technical objects”, in Bijker, W.E. and Law, J. (Eds), Shaping Technology/Building Society, Studies in Sociotechnical Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 205‐24.
2. Andreasen, M., Nielsen, H., Schrøder, S. and Stage, J. (2006), “Usability in open source software development: opinions and practice”, Information Technology and Control, Vol. 25 No. 3A, pp. 303‐12.
3. Asaro, P. (2000), “Transforming society by transforming technology: the science and politics of participatory design”, Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, Vol. 10, pp. 257‐90.
4. Benson, C., Müller‐Prove, M. and Mzourek, J. (2004), “Professional usability in open source projects: GNOME, OpenOffice.org, NetBeans”, Extended Abstracts of CHI 2004, ACM, New York, NY, pp. 1083‐4.
5. Bjerknes, G. and Bratteteig, T. (1995), “User participation and democracy. A discussion of Scandinavian research on system development”, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 73‐98.
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献