Author:
Tjornehoj Gitte,Mathiassen Lars
Abstract
PurposeWhile the literature on software process improvement (SPI) offers a number of studies of small software firms, little is known about how such initiatives evolve over time. On this backdrop, this paper aims to investigate how adoption of SPI technology was shaped over a ten year period (1996‐2005) in a small Danish software firm.Design/methodology/approachThe investigation is based on a longitudinal, interpretative case study of improvement efforts over a ten‐year period. To help structure the investigation, we focus on encounters that impacted engineering, management, and improvement practices within the firm. The study contributes to the SPI‐literature and the literature on organizational adoption of technology.FindingsThe paper finds the improvement effort fluctuating and shaped between management's attempt to control SPI technology adoption and events that caused the process to drift in unpredictable directions.Practical implicationsThe experiences suggest that managers of small software firms remain flexible and constantly negotiate technology adoption practices between control and drift, creating momentum and direction according to firm goals through attempts to control, while at the same time exploring backtalk, options, and innovations from drifting forces inside and outside the firm.Originality/valueBased on the research, the paper recommends substituting the “from control to drift” perspective on organizational adoption of complex technologies like SPI with a “negotiating control and drift” perspective.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,Information Systems
Reference87 articles.
1. Aaen, I., Arendt, J., Mathiassen, L. and Ngwenyama, O. (2001), “A conceptual map of software process improvement”, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 13, pp. 81‐101.
2. Ares, J., García, R., Juristo, N., López, M. and Moreno, A.M. (2000), “A more rigorous and comprehensive approach to software process assessment”, Software Process: Improvement and Practice, Vol. 5, pp. 3‐30.
3. Argyris, C. and Schön, D.A. (1978), Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Addison‐Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA.
4. Balla, K., Bemelmans, T., Kusters, R. and Trienekens, J. (2001), “Quality through managed improvement and measurement (QMIM): towards a phased development and implementation of a quality management system for a software company”, Software Quality Journal, Vol. 9, pp. 177‐93.
5. Batista, J. and Figueiredo, A.D.D. (2000), “SPI in a very small team: a case with CMM”, Software Process: Improvement and Practice, Vol. 5, pp. 243‐50.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献