Author:
Haakana Juha,Lassila Jukka,Kaipia Tero,Partanen Jarmo,Lohjala Juha,Niemelä Hanna
Abstract
PurposeUnderground cabling has become a true alternative in construction of electricity distribution networks, even in rural areas. The increasing amount of underground installations requires strategic work that helps to define the most profitable cabling targets. The purpose of this paper is to introduce a methodology to consider the underground cabling process.Design/methodology/approachThe paper proposes a cabling concept that covers the issues on how cabling should be carried out. The analysis is based on techno‐economic and reliability analyses. The methodology consists of several steps that together constitute the concept.FindingsThe underground cabling concept comprises several steps that can be simplified into questions: where, what, when and how the network cabling process is carried out. The analysis of these questions and the related features of the network show that different approaches to the renovation can cause significant differences in profitability between the renovation strategies.Research limitations/implicationsThe underground cabling concept provides a method to analyse the cabling process, and it contains several alternatives for applying the concept. Thus, the applicability of a certain method depends on the network and the objectives of the distribution system operator.Practical implicationsRenovation planning of the network has become common in distribution companies. Traditionally, ageing of the network has been the driver for the renovation. However, in the future, the scope of renovation planning should also include other renovation drivers, such as reliability.Originality/valueThe methodology proposed in the paper can be applied in the renovation and development process of distribution networks. The results are universal in the electricity distribution.
Subject
Strategy and Management,General Energy
Reference29 articles.
1. Bengtsson, P., Persson, L., Oberger, K. and Hasselström, J. (2009), “Reliability‐based planning in rural areas; goals, methods, prioritization, and follow‐up at fortum distribution”, Proceedings of the CIRED 2009, 20th International Conference on Electricity Distribution, Prague Czech.
2. Bertini, G.J. (2002), “Prioritizing reliability for underground distribution”, IEEE Computer Applications in Power, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 29‐34.
3. Brown, R.E. and Humphrey, B.G. (2005), “Asset management for transmission and distribution”, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 39‐45.
4. EMA (2011), “Sähkön jakeluverkkotoiminnan ja suunrjännitteisen jakeluverkkotoiminnan hinnoittelun kohtuullisuuden valvontamenetelmien suuntaviivat vuosille 2012‐2015 (“Guidelines for assessing reasonableness in pricing of electricity distribution network and high voltage distribution network operations for 2012–2015”)”, Energiamarkkinavirasto, Dnro 945/430/2010, Energy Market Authority of Finland, (in Finnish), available at: www.energiamarkkinavirasto.fi (accessed 26 April 2012).
5. Finnish Electricity Market Act (1995), (386/1995; amendments up to 1172/2004 included).