A canonical analysis of intentional information security breaches by insiders

Author:

Shropshire Jordan

Abstract

PurposeThe paper focuses on intentional information security breaches by insiders. The purpose is to assess the relationship between insiders' backgrounds and motivations and their deviant behaviors. Two outcome variables, information technology (IT) espionage and IT sabotage, are correlated with four predictors, financial changes, relationship strains, substance abuse, and job changes.Design/methodology/approachSome 62 cases of intentional information security breaches by insiders are examined using canonical analysis.FindingsThe results indicate that a significant relationship exists between financial hardship, relationship strains, and the theft and sale of proprietary data by insiders; and recent firings, substance abuse, and relationship strains are related to information system sabotage.Research limitations/implicationsBecause little or no research has been conducted on this topic, there is a lack of validated measures for variables associated with information security. Thus, the measures used in this paper are necessarily simplistic. Because few organizations report information security weaknesses, the sample is relatively small.Practical implicationsIn the majority of cases included in this paper, it is found that the insider convey a number of warning signs before committing the security breach. After reading this paper, diligent managers should be able to identify potential security breaches.Originality/valueThis is one of the first studies to explore insider security breaches using canonical analysis.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Management Science and Operations Research,Business and International Management,Management Information Systems

Reference53 articles.

1. Aldhizer, G. (2007), “The insider threat”, Internal Auditor, Vol. 65 No. 2, pp. 71‐3.

2. Ambrose, M., Seabright, M. and Schminke, M. (2000), “Sabotage in the workplace: the role of organizational injustice”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 89 No. 1, pp. 947‐66.

3. Band, S., Cappelli, D., Moore, A. and Shaw, E. (2006), Comparing Insider Sabotage and Espionage: A Model‐Based Analysis, Defense Personnel Security Research Center, Monterey, CA.

4. Barton, L. (2008), Crisis Leadership Now: A Real World Guide to Preparing for Threats, Disaster, Sabotage, and Scandal, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY.

5. Bechtoldt, M., Welk, C., Hartig, J. and Zapf, D. (2007), “Main and moderating effects of self‐control, organizational justice, and emotional labor on counterproductive behavior at work”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 479‐500.

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3