Sustainable development and sustainability as study objects for comparative management theory

Author:

Borim-de-Souza Rafael,Balbinot Zandra,Travis Eric Ford,Munck Luciano,Takahashi Adriana Roseli Wünsch

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to characterize sustainable development and sustainability as study objects for comparative management theory. Design/methodology/approach – The primary objective of this paper is to characterize sustainable development and sustainability as study objects for comparative management theory. Findings – Analytical dimensions were related to establishing three proposals, which represent possible theoretical routes for characterizing sustainable development and sustainability as study objects for comparative management theory. A framework which illustrates the theoretical route taken to develop these proposals is presented at the end of the theoretical-analytical discussions. Research limitations/implications – This paper considers that discussion about sustainable development, sustainability and comparative management theory, as interesting themes for organizational studies, lack epistemological clarity and theoretical depth. Such shortcomings are identified based upon the difficulty in identifying ontological postures, epistemological perspectives, dominant paradigms and conceptual approaches that enable greater coherence to analysis of these themes, and also support the undertaking of research that can contribute to enriching proposals related to comparative management theory. Originality/value – This is an innovative paper as it relates comparative management theory approaches with structural concepts from sustainable development and sustainability developed using contributions from organizational theories, sociological reflections, and political science. The proposed characterization is intended to blaze new and alternative epistemological paths for adding greater rigor to empirical research focussed on the relationship investigated here in a theoretical context.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Cultural Studies

Reference123 articles.

1. Adler, N.J. (1980), “Cultural synergy: the management of cross-cultural organizations”, in Burke, W.W. and Goodstein, L.D. (Eds), Trends and Issues in OD: Current Theory and Practice , University Associates, San Diego, CA, pp. 163-184.

2. Adler, N.J. (1983), “Cross-cultural management research: the ostriche and the trend”, Academy of Management Review , Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 226-232.

3. Adler, N.J. and Ghadar, F. (1990), “International strategy from the perspective of people and culture: the North American context”, in Rugman, A.M. (Ed.), Research in Global Strategic Management: International Business Research for the Twenty First Century , JAI Press, Greenwich, pp. 179-205.

4. Adler, N.J. , Doktor, R. and Redding, S.G. (1986), “From the Atlantic to the pacific century: cross-cultural management reviewed”, Journal of Management , Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 295-318.

5. Alton, A.J. (1969), “Comparative mamagement: how useful to the practioner?”, Management International Review , Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 3-11.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3