Author:
Shaw David,Seaward Helene,Pageau Felix,Wangmo Tenzin,Elger Bernice S.
Abstract
PurposeThis paper aims to describe and analyse Swiss prisoners’ and experts’ views on collective punishment, the practice where a group is punished for one person’s transgression.Design/methodology/approachA series of qualitative interviews with prisoners and stakeholders are reported following thematic analysis.FindingsDespite being forbidden by the Geneva Convention and other international instruments, participants from this study expressed the view that collective punishment continues to be practiced in some form in prisons in Switzerland, violating the rights of prisoners via unjust and arbitrary decision-making, unjust rules, inequalities in prison structures and continuation of incarceration based on the behaviour of others. Families can also be both victims and vectors of collective punishment, and prolonging the detention of prisoners who would otherwise have been released because of rare high-profile cases of reoffending can also be considered a form of collective punishment.Originality/valueThese significant findings suggest that collective punishment in various forms continues to be used in Swiss prisons.
Subject
Health Professions (miscellaneous)
Reference19 articles.
1. Figures of deterrence in late imperial China. Frequency, spatial repartition, and types of crimes targeted by dismemberment under the Qing dynasty;Crime, Histoire & Sociétés,2014
2. Using thematic analysis in psychology;Qualitative Research in Psychology,2006
3. Expert perspectives on Western European prison health services: do ageing prisoners receive equivalent care?,2014
4. Council of Europe. (2020), “Recommendation rec(2006)2-rev of the committee of ministers to member states on the European prison rules”, available at: https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectID=09000016809ee581
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献