Perceptions of collective and other unjust punishment in Swiss prisons: a qualitative exploration

Author:

Shaw David,Seaward Helene,Pageau Felix,Wangmo Tenzin,Elger Bernice S.

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to describe and analyse Swiss prisoners’ and experts’ views on collective punishment, the practice where a group is punished for one person’s transgression.Design/methodology/approachA series of qualitative interviews with prisoners and stakeholders are reported following thematic analysis.FindingsDespite being forbidden by the Geneva Convention and other international instruments, participants from this study expressed the view that collective punishment continues to be practiced in some form in prisons in Switzerland, violating the rights of prisoners via unjust and arbitrary decision-making, unjust rules, inequalities in prison structures and continuation of incarceration based on the behaviour of others. Families can also be both victims and vectors of collective punishment, and prolonging the detention of prisoners who would otherwise have been released because of rare high-profile cases of reoffending can also be considered a form of collective punishment.Originality/valueThese significant findings suggest that collective punishment in various forms continues to be used in Swiss prisons.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Professions (miscellaneous)

Reference19 articles.

1. Figures of deterrence in late imperial China. Frequency, spatial repartition, and types of crimes targeted by dismemberment under the Qing dynasty;Crime, Histoire & Sociétés,2014

2. Using thematic analysis in psychology;Qualitative Research in Psychology,2006

3. Expert perspectives on Western European prison health services: do ageing prisoners receive equivalent care?,2014

4. Council of Europe. (2020), “Recommendation rec(2006)2-rev of the committee of ministers to member states on the European prison rules”, available at: https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectID=09000016809ee581

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3