Author:
M. Taaffe Kevin,William Allen Robert,Grigg Lindsey
Abstract
Purpose
– Performance measurements or metrics are that which measure a company's performance and behavior, and are used to help an organization achieve and maintain success. Without the use of performance metrics, it is difficult to know whether or not the firm is meeting requirements or making desired improvements. During the course of this study with Lockheed Martin, the research team was tasked with determining the effectiveness of the site's existing performance metrics that are used to help an organization achieve and maintain success. Without the use of performance metrics, it is difficult to know whether or not the firm is meeting requirements or making desired improvements. The paper aims to discuss these issues.
Design/methodology/approach
– Research indicates that there are five key elements that influence the success of a performance metric. A standardized method of determining whether or not a metric has the right mix of these elements was created in the form of a metrics scorecard.
Findings
– The scorecard survey was successful in revealing good metric use, as well as problematic metrics. In the quality department, the Document Rejects metric has been reworked and is no longer within the executive's metric deck. It was also recommended to add root cause analysis, and to quantify and track the cost of non-conformance and the overall cost of quality. In total, the number of site wide metrics has decreased from 75 to 50 metrics. The 50 remaining metrics are undergoing a continuous improvement process in conjunction with the use of the metric scorecard tool developed in this research.
Research limitations/implications
– The metrics scorecard should be used site-wide for an assessment of all metrics. The focus of this paper is on the metrics within the quality department.
Practical implications
– Putting a quick and efficient metrics assessment technique in place was critical. With the leadership and participation of Lockheed Martin, this goal was accomplished.
Originality/value
– This paper presents the process of metrics evaluation and the issues that were encountered during the process, including insights that would not have been easily documented without this mechanism. Lockheed Martin Company has used results from this research. Other industries could also apply the methods proposed here.
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Strategy and Management,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Reference22 articles.
1. Bond, T.C.
(1999), “The role of performance measurement in continuous improvement”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 19 No. 12, pp. 1318-1334.
2. Chien, S.W.
and
Tsaur, S.M.
(2007), “Investigating the success of ERP systems: case studies in three Taiwanese high-tech industries”, Computers in Industry, Vol. 58 Nos 8/9, pp. 783-793.
3. De Haas, H.F.M.
and
Verrijdt, J.H.C.M.
(1997), “Target setting for the departments in an aircraft repairable item system”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 99 No. 3, pp. 596-602.
4. Department of Energy (DOE)
(2002), Work Smart Standard (WSS) Users' Handbook (DOE-HDBK-1148-2002), Washington, DC.
5. Department of Trade and Industry
(2011), Performance Measurement, Department of Trade and Industry, London, available at: www.dti.gov.uk/quality/performance (accessed December 2, 2011).
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献