Dual diagnosis capability after an AOD workforce initiative
Author:
Lee Nicole K.,Cameron Jacqui,Harney Angela,Roeg Sandra
Abstract
PurposeDissemination of good practice information to practitioners is one of the great challenges of the substance abuse treatment sector. The authors' understanding of the process by which research is translated is limited, but a whole of workforce approach is considered best practice. This paper aims to examine organisational change as a result of a workforce capacity‐building program over six months.Design/methodology/approachA total of 195 staff (nine service managers, 39 supervisors and 147 clinicians) in 13 alcohol and other drug (AOD) services across Australia participated in mental health screening and brief intervention training using PsyCheck. PsyCheck is designed to detect and address common mental health symptoms among drug treatment clients. The Dual Diagnosis Capability in Addiction Treatment (DDCAT) index was used to measure capacity before and after training.FindingsThere was no significant difference between baseline and follow‐up DDCAT scores; however, the level of PsyCheck implementation indicated improvement in DDCAT scores.Practical implicationsThe results show that where organisations implement the program successfully, capacity improves; where the program is not well implemented, capacity reduces. Successful implementers report a number of common elements: the screening tool was implemented into routine assessment; there was a single onsite “champion” supporting the implementation; and they worked with the staff and persisted with the implementation even where there was initial worker resistance.Originality/valueThis paper provides the opportunity to assess workforce capacity building and the feasibility of utilising the DCCAT to measure co‐occurring mental health and substance use disorders in Australian AOD services.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Pshychiatric Mental Health
Reference32 articles.
1. Ashcraft, R.G.P., Foster, S.L., Lowery, A.E., Henggeler, S.W., Chapman, J.E. and Rowland, M.D. (2011), “Measuring practitioner attitudes toward evidence‐based treatments: a validation study”, Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, Vol. 20, pp. 166‐83. 2. Baer, J.S., Ball, S.A., Campbell, B.K., Miele, G.M., Schoener, E.P. and Tracy, K. (2007), “Training and fidelity monitoring of behavioral interventions in multi‐site addictions research”, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Vol. 87, pp. 107‐18. 3. Baker, A.L. and Roche, A. (2002), “Editorial: from training to work‐force development: a large and important conceptual leap”, Drug and Alcohol Review, Vol. 21, pp. 205‐7. 4. Baker, A.L., Kay‐Lambkin, F.J. and Lee, N. (2009), “When less is more: addressing symptoms of mental health problems in drug and alcohol treatment settings”, Mental Health and Substance Use: Dual Diagnosis, Vol. 2, pp. 130‐9. 5. Cameron, J., Lee, N.K. and Harney, A. (2010), “Changes in attitude to, and confidence in, working with comorbidity after training in screening and brief intervention”, Mental Health and Substance Use: Dual Diagnosis, Vol. 3, p. 124.
|
|