Security risk management: a case of Qalhat liquefied natural gas terminal

Author:

Mokhtari Kambiz,Abdul Rahman Noorul Shaiful Fitri,Soltani Hamid Reza,Al Rashdi Salim Ahmed,Abdul Aziz Mohammed Al Balushi Kawkab

Abstract

Purpose At the substantive level, there exists a gap in knowledge about the position of security risk management (i.e. SRM) during the terminals’ operations and management; particularly when there is potential for deliberate anti-security acts. Correspondingly, the purpose of this paper is a need for more practical research to find out the justification for the existence of the SRM and different techniques for its appropriate execution on these logistics infrastructures principally with due regard to the potential requirements in the near future. Design/methodology/approach Both qualitative and quantitative techniques are used in this study incorporating fuzzy set theory and risk assessment matrix to achieve the research objective. Findings A designed SRM framework tailored for Qalhat liquefied petroleum gas (LNG) terminal in Sultanate of Oman was established to manage the security threats which can be resulted from any probable terrorist attacks. Research limitations/implications The limited numbers of experts for the purpose of the addressed SRM are causing challenges in data collection. Practical implications The pressures for enhanced attention to critical infrastructure security have fostered new challenges for petrochemical seaports and terminals (PSTs). These tendencies dictate to maintain comprehensive security regimens that can be integrated with national and international strategies to support the country’s security against terrorism. Originality/value The development of the security risk factor table model in the case of Qalhat LNG Terminal.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,Transportation,Business and International Management

Reference34 articles.

1. American Bureau Shipping (ABS) (2003), “A guide for risk evaluations for the classification of marine-related facilities”, available at: https://ww2.eagle.org/content/dam/eagle/rules-and-guides/current/other/117_riskevalforclassofmarinerelatedfacilities/pub117_riskeval.pdf (accessed 08 January 2019).

2. American Petroleum Institute (API) (2013). “Security risk assessment methodology for the petroleum and petrochemical industries”, ANSI/API STD 780, available at: https://standards.globalspec.com/std/1603209/ansi-api-std-780 (accessed 15 December 2019).

3. Conversion of probabilistic information into fuzzy sets for engineering decision analysis;Computers and Structures,2006

4. A study on the performance assessment of anti-terrorism physical protection systems in chemical plants;Safety Science,2017

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3