Climate risk management in river-based tilapia cage culture in northern Thailand
Author:
Lebel Phimphakan,Whangchai Niwooti,Chitmanat Chanagun,Lebel Louis
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to analyse how fish farmers manage climate-related risks and explore possible ways to strengthen risk management under current and future climate.
Design/methodology/approach
– In total, 662 fish farmers in sites across Northern Thailand were interviewed about risks to the profitability of their fish farms and ways such risks were managed. Nonlinear canonical correlation analysis was used to relate risk factors to management practices at farm and river levels. In total, 68 in-depth interviews with farmers and other stakeholders provided additional information on climate risk management practices.
Findings
– Farmers use a combination of adjustments to rearing practices, cropping calendars and financial and social measures to manage those risks, which they perceive as being manageable. Many risks are season, river and place specific; implying that the risk profiles of individual farms can vary substantially. Individual risks are often addressed through multiple practices and strategies; conversely, a particular management practice can have a bearing on several different risks. Farmers recognize that risks must be managed at farm and higher spatial and administrative scales. Social relations and information play critical roles in managing these complex combinations of risks.
Originality/value
– This is one of the first papers to report in detail on how inland fish farmers manage climate-related risks. It underlines the need to consider multiple spatial and temporal scales and that farmers do not manage individual climate-related risks in isolation from other risks.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Development,Geography, Planning and Development,Global and Planetary Change
Reference36 articles.
1. Abdelhak, S.
,
Sulaiman, J.
and
Mohd, S.
(2012), “Poverty among rural communities in Kelantan and Terengganu: the role of institutions, farmers’ risk management and coping strategies”,
Journal of Applied Sciences
, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 125-135. 2. Abery, N.
,
Hai, N.
,
Hao, N.
,
Minh, T.
,
Phuong, N.
,
Sumnongsong, S.
,
Dulyapurk, V.
,
Kaewnern, M.
,
Nagothu, U.
and
De Silva, S.
(2009),
Perception of Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation of Shrimp Farming in Ca Mau and Bac Lieu, Vietnam: Farmer Focus Group Discussions and Stakeholder Workshop Report
, Network of Aquaculture Centres in Asia Pacific, Bangkok. 3. Ahsan, D.
and
Roth, E.
(2010), “Farmers’ perceived risks and risk management strategies in an emerging mussel aquaculture industry in Denmark”,
Marine Resource Economics
, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 309-323. 4. Ahsan, D.A.
(2011), “Farmers’ motivations, risk perceptions and risk management strategies in a developing economy: Bangladesh experience”,
Journal of Risk Research
, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 325-349. 5. Belton, B.
,
Little, D.
and
Grady, K.
(2009), “Is responsible aquaculture sustainable aquaculture? WWF and the eco-certification of Tilapia”,
Society & Natural Resources
, Vol. 22 No. 9, pp. 840-855.
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|