Citizens' perceptions of World Heritage values: the case of Cuenca, Ecuador
-
Published:2023-02-28
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:2044-1266
-
Container-title:Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JCHMSD
Author:
Molina BarbaraORCID, Eljuri GabrielaORCID, Roigé Ventura XavierORCID
Abstract
PurposeThis paper aims to study possible differences between the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) defined in the designation of Cuenca as a World Heritage (WH) site and its inhabitants' perceptions of heritage value. The study is based on research conducted in the historic centre of Cuenca in Ecuador, which was accorded WH status in 1999.Design/methodology/approachThe research employs both quantitative and qualitative methodologies, providing a complementary approach to the research subject. Quantitative research involved a probability survey of 400 informants randomly selected from the population of the canton of Cuenca, while qualitative research included 40 semi-structured interviews with residents and traders in the historic centre and 150 further written consultations with residents of the city.FindingsFollowing the introduction, methodology and description, the paper presents the data gathered from the survey and interviews. These indicate inhabitants' perceptions of the meaning, values, and uses of WH in Cuenca and reveal differences between their perceptions and those of the official OUV.Originality/valueAlthough there are several studies on WH residents' perceptions of UNESCO OUV, few highlight the mismatch between local community views of heritage and those established by UNESCO. This study reflects critically on the concept of OUV, which is based on technical and political criteria rather than social participation. The study employs methodologies that could be applied in other case studies and used to improve heritage management. This is the only study on local perceptions of Cuenca's OUV.
Subject
Urban Studies,General Business, Management and Accounting,Geography, Planning and Development,Conservation
Reference52 articles.
1. The distinction between qualitative and quantitative research methods is problematic;Quality and Quantity,2012 2. Arizpe, L. (2000), “Cultural heritage and globalization”, in Avrami, E., Mason, R. and De la Torre, M. (Eds), Values and Heritage Conservation, The Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles, pp. 32-37. 3. Heritage engagement and subjective well-being in the European union;Sustainability,2021 4. Avrami, E. and Mason, R. (2019), “Mapping the issue of values”, in Avrami, E., Macdonald, S., Mason, R. and Myers, D. (Eds), Values in Heritage Management: Emerging Approaches and Research Directions, Getty Publications, available at: https://muse.jhu.edu/book/74916 5. Bortolotto, C. (2015), “UNESCO and heritage self-determination: negotiating meaning in the intergovernmental committee for the safeguarding of the ICH”, in Adell, N., Bendix, R.F., Bortolotto, C. and Tauschek, M. (Eds), Between Imagined Communities of Practice: Participation, Territory and the Making of Heritage, Göttingen University Press, Göttingen, pp. 249-272.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|