When theory meets praxis – enhancing heritage management through practice-led research at Great Zimbabwe World Heritage property
-
Published:2023-05-12
Issue:3
Volume:13
Page:428-446
-
ISSN:2044-1266
-
Container-title:Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JCHMSD
Author:
Thondhlana Thomas PanganayiORCID,
Mukwende Tawanda,
Machiridza Lesley Hatipone,
Musindo Tendai Treddah,
Tevera Genius,
Maduro Nyaradzayi
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to outline and reflect on the new research agenda for the Great Zimbabwe World Heritage property. This research agenda was jointly developed by academics and practitioners from Great Zimbabwe University (GZU) and the National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe (NMMZ) respectively. This Research-Practice Team was put together for the Heritage Place Lab (HPL), a pilot project of the ICCROM-IUCN World Heritage Leadership programme.Design/methodology/approachA series of steps were undertaken to come up with research priorities and a new research agenda that are presented in this paper. The HPL project involved online workshops, due to the COVID-19 travel restrictions, that were held between September 2021 and April 2022. The HPL methodology involved six assignments that were based on the Enhancing Our Heritage Toolkit 2.0 (EOH) which was being designed by UNESCO and its Advisory Bodies. This toolkit encouraged the team to establish site-specific management issues and research needs. The toolkit helped the team to have a detailed appreciation of the site's Outstanding Universal Value as well as other heritage values of national and local importance. The toolkit also involved the mapping of site attributes and multiple actors as well as the analysis of governance and legal frameworks. The toolkit also required the team to identify factors affecting the heritage property.FindingsThe Research-Practice Team highlighted challenges that resulted from the legacy of ill-informed research activities and conservation efforts at the World Heritage property. It became more apparent that the site managers were prioritizing the physical fabric of the site at the expense of the spiritual aspects. Lack of coordination among the actors was also undermining the governance structure. Four thematic strands which included local values and intangible cultural heritage elements; heritage governance; climate change and environmental sustainability and incorporation of local knowledge systems were identified for further research.Originality/valueThe paper is an outcome of collaborative efforts that were done by academics and practitioners. Researchers and site managers at Great Zimbabwe had hitherto worked in silos. The majority of previous and ongoing research on the World Heritage property falls short of addressing the dire management challenges. The paper is an attempt to broaden the scope in terms of the management of the site. In the past focus has been on the monumental aspects of the site with specific reference to the dry-stone walled structures. However, in this instance, the Research-Practice Team has integrated new interests such as the intangible aspects of Great Zimbabwe, spirituality and community beneficiation.
Subject
Urban Studies,General Business, Management and Accounting,Geography, Planning and Development,Conservation
Reference53 articles.
1. Tourism in the presentation of monuments in Zimbabwe,1991
2. The production, distribution and consumption of metals and alloys at Great Zimbabwe;Archaeometry,2016
3. How can science connect with and contribute to conservation? Recommendations and reflections;Studies in Conservations,2016
4. Linking the conservation of culture and nature: a case study of sacred forests in Zimbabwe;Human Ecology,2001