Managing development in an era of radical change: evolving a relational perspective

Author:

Doyle Mike

Abstract

Despite an apparent increase in investment and commitment over the last ten years, more recent studies now give grounds for reservations about overall ability of management development to meet the challenges of radical change and fulfil its strategic potential. Argues that the constraints imposed by a complex array of contextual influences emanating from an increasingly turbulent organisational system pose risks to investment and commitment in development. Unless these influences can be managed effectively, management development may start to lag behind or fall out of synchronisation with the needs and demands of managers and their employing organisations. Examines the case for a shift towards a more situated and contextual view of management development where the complex dynamics induced by radical change are considered and managed alongside or even ahead of development strategies and approaches. Posits a framework for a more relational approach and explores some of the issues this raises.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Reference95 articles.

1. Antonacopoulou, E. and FitzGerald, L. (1996), “Reframing competency in management development”, Human Resource Management Journal, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 27‐48.

2. Atkinson, S. and Meldrum, M. (1998), “Don’t waste money on management development”, Organisation and People, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 4‐11.

3. Boydell, T. and Leary, M. (1994), “From management development to managing development: the changing role of the manager in the learning organisation”, Transitions, Vol. 94 No. 9, pp. 8‐9.

4. Broussine, M., Gray, M., Kirk, P., Paumier, K., Tichelar, M. and Young, S (1998), “The best and worst time for management development”, Journal of Management Development, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 56‐67.

5. Buchanan, D. and Badham, R. (1999), Power, Politics and Organisational Change: Winning the Turf Game, Sage, London.

Cited by 22 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3