Decomposing the role of mobility restrictions in controlling COVID-19 outcomes: a regional level study of the Philippines
-
Published:2022-07-05
Issue:4
Volume:27
Page:410-424
-
ISSN:2059-4631
-
Container-title:International Journal of Health Governance
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:IJHG
Author:
Gaduena AmmielouORCID, Caboverde Christopher EdORCID, Flaminiano John PaulORCID, Romero Regina YvetteORCID
Abstract
PurposeThis paper aims to explore empirically the interactions between the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, economic mobility and containment policy to test the effectiveness of mobility restrictions in controlling the spread of the disease.Design/methodology/approachThis study used weekly regional data for the 17 Philippine regions and estimated the effect of shocks using a panel vector autoregression (VAR) model.FindingsThe authors conclude that COVID-19 deaths and incidence primarily respond to shocks that affect the lethality and transmissibility of the disease, and mobility restrictions and strict quarantine levels do not seem to have any impact on these outcomes. The movement of people during this pandemic period, on the other hand, seems to respond more to economic factors and government restrictions and less to the presence of and the characteristics of the disease.Originality/valueSince the pandemic is a public bad, community cooperation is a must to address it. Clear government messaging that dispels doubts on the safety of the newly developed vaccines and that encourages public acceptance and trust might be a better nudge compared to a heavy-handed and threatening approach.
Subject
Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference20 articles.
1. Acemoglu, D., Chernozhukov, V., Werning, I. and Whinston, M. (2020), “Optimal Targeted Lockdowns in a Multi-Group SIR Model”, available at: http://economics.mit.edu/files/19698. 2. Arnon, A., Ricco, J. and Smetters, K. (2020), “Epidemiological and economic effects of lockdown”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, available at: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Arnon-paper.pdf. 3. Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford (2021), “Oxford COVID-19 government response tracker”, available at: https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/research/research-projects/covid-19-government-response-tracker. 4. Caulkins, J.P., Grass, D., Feichtinger, G., Hartl, R.F., Kort, P.M., Fürnkranz-Prskawetz, A., Seidl, A. and Wrzaczek, S. (2022), “COVID-19 and optimal lockdown strategies: the effect of new and more virulent strains”, in Boado-Penas, M.C., Eisenberg, J. and Şahin, Ş. (Eds), Pandemics: Insurance and Social Protection, Springer, Cham, pp. 163-190, ISBN 978-3-030-78334-1 10.1007/978-3-030-78334-1_9.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. IJHG27.4 Review;International Journal of Health Governance;2022-10-21
|
|