Abstract
Purpose
– This study aims to measure the Thai approach of corporate sustainability. In the corporate world, the Thai philosophy of Sufficiency Economy can be applied to ensure corporate sustainability. Derived from the literature, a structural model expressing relationships between six independent variables of Sufficiency Economy indicators and three dependent variables of sustainability performance outcomes is formed accordingly, followed by hypotheses to be tested.
Design/methodology/approach
– The model is tested through a random sample of 294 chief executive officers (CEOs) in Thailand who were asked to respond to a questionnaire. Factor and regression analyses are adopted to test the hypotheses.
Findings
– Findings indicate that “perseverance” and “resilience” are two direct predictors of three sustainability outcomes of the firm’s enhanced capacity to deliver strong performance, endure social and economic crises and deliver public benefits. “Geosocial development” is a direct predictor of firm’s enhanced capacity to deliver public benefits and an indirect predictor of firm’s enhanced capacity to deliver strong performance and to endure social and economic crises. “Moderation” is an indirect predictor of the firm’s capacity to endure social and economic crises, while “sharing” is an indirect predictor of all three sustainability performance outcomes.
Practical implications
– Small- and medium-sized enterprises business leaders should develop a “perseverance” culture in their organizations and practice “resilience” to enhance their corporate sustainability prospect. Moreover, they should adopt “geosocial development”, “moderation” and “sharing” practices in their organizations, as these practices positively affect corporate sustainability performance directly or indirectly.
Originality/value
– This study is among the first few studies that identify corporate sustainability performance predictors.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference31 articles.
1. Allio, R.J.
(2011), “Reinventing management purpose: the radical and virtuous alternatives”, Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 4-11.
2. Avery, G.C.
(2005), Leadership for Sustainable Futures: Achieving Success in a Competitive World, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
3. Avery, G.C.
and
Bergsteiner, H.
(2010), Honeybees and Locusts: The Business Case for Sustainable Leadership, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.
4. Avery, G.C.
and
Bergsteiner, H.
(2011), “Sustainable leadership: practices for enhancing business resilience and performance”, Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 39 No. 3, pp. 5-15.
5. Brenner, S.N.
and
Cochran, P.
(1991), “The stakeholder theory of the firm: Implications for business and society theory and research”, In
Mahon, J.F.
(Ed.), Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society Second Annual Conference, Sundance, UT, pp. 449-467.
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献