Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to investigate the two components of market discipline, investment account holder (IAH) monitoring and the consequent reaction of the Islamic banks in GCC countries for the 2004–2013 period, including the recent financial crisis of 2008.
Design/methodology/approach
We address the research question that Investment Account holders (IAH) in GCC countries suc as Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), Bahrain and United Arab Emirates (UAE) monitor their banks. Regression analysis was used to examine the dependence level of profit-sharing investment account (PSIA) growth rate on bank risk characteristics (CAMEL variables). Then, the reaction of banks by regression influencing CAMEL variables of one-lagged period on PSIA growth rate was verified.
Findings
The results provide evidence of the first component of market discipline, i.e. the IAH monitoring, in KSA, Bahrain and UAE. The common result to the three countries is that market actors are concerned with accounting information on capital adequacy. However, in UAE, they are also interested in assets performance, whereas they look more at earnings in Bahrain. The results show evidence of the second component in Bahrain; the bank reaction to IAH monitoring and subsequently IAH discipline in Bahrain. Finally, the results do not support any impact of the financial crisis.
Research limitations/implications
The sample size is small although it is constituted by banks having a sufficient number of observations.
Practical implications
This study highlights the importance of IAH discipline, which would help prudential bank monitoring by regulators and wealth development for both investors and managers. It should increase the disclosure of relevant information as for the part of effective accountability of Islamic banks’ governance.
Originality/value
This study contributes to the literature on market discipline by dealing with Islamic banks. It is one of the very few studies to investigate IAH discipline in Islamic banks and the second component of market discipline, i.e. the influence of monitoring on banks.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Accounting,Business and International Management
Reference64 articles.
1. Failure and potential of profit-loss sharing contracts: a perspective of New Institutional Economics (NIE) theory;Pacific-Basin Finance Journal,2014
2. Ahmad, A. (2012), “Islamic banks in Asia, and their differences with their GCC counter”, available at: https://asianbankingandfinance.net/islamic-banking/commentary/islamic-banks-in-asia-and-their-differences-their-gcc-counterparts
3. Reflecting on islamic banking and financial crisis: Risks, reputation and stability,2014
4. Do profit-sharing investment account holders provide market discipline in an islamic banking system?;Journal of Financial Regulation,2017
5. Profit-sharing investment accounts in islamic banks or mutualization, accounting perspective;Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting,2016
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献