Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to analyse international business (IB) scholarship and present current gaps and new realities to enhance scholarly discourse.Design/methodology/approachThe paper divides the scholarship into three distinct sections. First, it interrogates the changing definitions of the field from the 1880s to date. Secondly, IB paradigms are cross-examined while highlighting the understudied emerging interaction paradigm. Lastly, literature gaps, methodological gaps and new realities in IB are presented.FindingsThis research shows that IB inquiry has concentrated on firm-level paradigms, leaving the emerging interaction paradigm understudied. As a result, there is a deficit of novel ideas and limited research on critical emerging issues affecting IB. Further, simplistic methodologies are prevalent, making IB scholarship weak. Additionally, a majority of studies concentrate on the Americas, Europe and Asia, leaving Africa understudied.Originality/valueThis research augments the need for scholars to cross-examine the best approach to apply in IB discourse and presents gaps calling for new insights and future research directions.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science,Literature and Literary Theory,History,Cultural Studies
Reference93 articles.
1. Choice of foreign market entry mode: impact of ownership, location and internalization factors;Journal of International Business Studies,1992
2. Modes of foreign entry: a transaction cost analysis and propositions;Journal of International Business Studies,1986
3. Intra-Cultural variation: evidence and implications for international business;Journal of International Business Studies,1999
4. A bibliometric approach to the publications in the field of international business in the scopus database;IBIMA Business Review,2020
5. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage;Journal of Management,1991