What do European stock markets prefer? Left or right governments?

Author:

Stoian Andreea,Tatu-Cornea Delia

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the influence of the political partisanship of government in charges of returns on the European stock markets. The authors found a large body of research investigating this issue for the case of US stock market but less evidence for the European stock markets. Design/methodology/approach – The authors employ a panel data model with fixed-effects and an additional dynamic panel model using the bias-corrected LSDV estimator on a data set consisting of monthly and quarterly data. The data range from 2000 to 2010 and cover 20 European Union (EU) countries. The authors test several hypotheses, and run distinct regressions using political, financial, and economic variables. The authors also divide the data set into two sub-samples in order to reveal the distinctions between advanced and emerging economies in the EU. Findings – The authors find that stock markets perform better under right-wing administrations. The result is consistent for the advanced EU economies, but the authors found no robust evidence in that sense for emerging countries. Additionally, the authors show that European stock market preferences for right/left-wing administrations is not necessarily related to the beliefs about the size of unemployment, inflation, deficit, and/or debt, which opens the field for further research in this area. Originality/value – The study contributes to existing knowledge. It examines if Wall Street folklore, asserting for many decades that stock markets perform better under right-wing governments, also holds for European stock markets given the distinctions in the political and financial systems between USA and Europe. Moreover, the authors underline the introduction in the analysis of the Central and Eastern European countries.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Finance

Reference51 articles.

1. Alesina, A. and Perotti, R. (1999), “Budget deficits and budget institutions”, in Poterba, J.M. and von Hagen, J. (Eds), Fiscal Institutions and Fiscal Performance , NBER/University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 13-36.

2. Armingeon, K. , Careja, R. , Knöpfel, L. , Weisstanner, D. , Engler, S. , Potolidis, P. and Gerber, M. (2013), “Comparative political data set III 1990-2011”, Institute of Political Science , University of Berne, Berne.

3. Bawn, K. and Rosenbluth, F. (2006), “Short versus long coalitions: electoral accountability and the size of the public sector”, American Journal of Political Science , Vol. 50 No. 2, pp. 251-265.

4. Bértoa, C.F. (2011), “Sources of party system institutionalization in new democracies: lessons from east central Europe”, EUI Working Paper Series No. 1, European University Institute, Department of Political and Social Sciences, Florence.

5. Bértoa, C.F. and Mair, P. (2010), “Two decades on: how institutionalized are post-communist party systems?”, EUI Working Paper Series No. 3, European University Institute, Department of Political and Social Sciences.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3