Gatecrashing: an exploration of community attitudes and experiences

Author:

Earl Cameron,Patten Emma

Abstract

PurposeThis article aims to present the findings from a study designed to gain a general understanding of community attitudes and experiences associated with gatecrashing at outdoor music festivals (OMFs).Design/methodology/approachThis study was an exploratory, descriptive study with data collection involving a web based, survey tool and convenience and snowballing sampling methodologies. A total of 196 people from across Australia participated in the study.FindingsThe key findings were that 15.3 per cent of the respondents were supportive of others gatecrashing, 65.3 per cent were against others gatecrashing while the remaining study participants did not care either way (19.4 per cent). About 39 per cent of the respondents had considered gatecrashing an event however the majority of this group (86 per cent) did not go through with these intentions. The remainder of the respondents (61 per cent) had never personally considered gatecrashing an event. In total, 11 per cent of study participants reported having gatecrashed events and there was generally a level of planning associated with their gatecrashing experiences. The male respondents were more supportive and more likely to have considered gatecrashing an event than the female participants. Males also made up the majority of the study participants that had gatecrashed events.Research limitations/implicationsThe collection of data involved the use of convenience and snowballing sampling methodologies and voluntary participation. As these methods are non‐probability based and so generalisations from this sample group were not be discussed in terms of the wider population.Practical implicationsIt is expected that these findings will inform the work of event organisers and regulatory authorities involved in managing gatecrashing at these events.Social implicationsThis study provides supportive evidence to inform education campaigns designed to reduce the impacts of gatecrashing at outdoor music events.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the body of knowledge on gatecrashing behaviour within the context of OMFs.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Business, Management and Accounting,Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

Reference33 articles.

1. Australian Council for the Arts (2010), More than Bums on Seats: Australian Participation in the Arts, Australian Council for the Arts, Sydney.

2. Avon and Somerset Constabulary (2000), Report to Mendip Council Regulatory Board on the 12th October 2000 Regarding the Glastonbury Festival 2000, available at: www.avsompol.co.uk/report/ (accessed 1 March 2001).

3. Bouma, G.D. (1996), The Research Process, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, Melbourne.

4. Connell, T. (2009), “Anti‐social behaviour at major outdoor events”, Journal of Crowd Safety and Security Management, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 23‐31.

5. Crano, W.D. and Prislin, R. (2006), “Attitudes and persuasion”, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 54, pp. 345‐74.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3