Author:
Samarkanov Dmitry,Gillon Frédéric,Brochet Pascal,Laloy Daniel
Abstract
Purpose
– Discrete highly constrained optimization of induction machine taking into consideration two objective functions: efficiency and total costs of production. The paper aims to discuss these issues.
Design/methodology/approach
– Interactive and semi-interactive interval-based optimization methods were used. Two concepts of multi-objective discrete optimization were proposed.
Findings
– Proposed methodology and algorithms allow decision maker (DM) participate in the process of optimal design and therefore decrease the total time of optimization process. The search procedure is straightforward and it does not require special skills of DM. Presented methods were successfully versified for the problem of optimal design with discrete variables.
Research limitations/implications
– Three interval algorithms suitable for inverse problems are researched and verified. It generally can be used for multi-objective problems. The dominance principles for interval boxes are showed in the paper. Proposed algorithms are based on the idea of hybridization of exact and evolutionary methods.
Practical implications
– Proposed approaches were successfully implemented within computer-aided application which is used by manufacturer of high power induction machine.
Originality/value
– The concept of pareto-domination using the interval boxes can be treated as original. The paper researched several elimination rules and discusses the difference between different approaches.
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Computational Theory and Mathematics,Computer Science Applications
Reference18 articles.
1. Baril, C.
and
Yacout, S.
et al. (2012), “An interactive multi-objective algorithm for decentralized decision making in product design”, Optimization and Engineering, Vol. 13, pp. 121-150.
2. Fontchastagner, J.
,
Lefevre, Y.
and
Messine, F.
(2009), “Some co-axial magnetic couplings designed using an analytical model and an exact global optimization code”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 45 No. 3, pp. 1458-1461.
3. Hartikainen, M.
(2011), “Approximation through interpolation in nonconvex multiobjective optimization”, Ser. Jyvaskyla Studies in Computing. Jyvaskylan yliopisto, Vol. 141, pp. 15-34.
4. Irimie, D.
et al
. (2008), “Comparative loss analysis of small three-phase cage induction motors”, 2010 XIX International Conference on
Electrical Machines (ICEM), September, pp.1-4.
5. Korhonen, P.
and
Karaivanova, J.
(1999), “An algorithm for projecting a reference direction onto the nondominated set of given points”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, Vol. 29 No. 5, pp. 429-435.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献