Author:
Hanz Katherine,Lange Jessica
Abstract
Purpose – This article aims to discuss an innovative, student‐centered method for engaging students in one‐shot information literacy workshops. By using student‐generated questions to find out what students want to know about the library, the authors examine how the students' questions are used both as an ice breaker activity and as a means to orient the workshop's content. Design/methodology/approach – A literature review discusses various approaches to active learning activities in one‐shot information literacy workshops as well as methods for assessing students' library knowledge prior to workshops. The authors' own case study identifies best practices for implementing the activity. Finally, the authors discuss the types of student questions they collected from students over the course of two semesters. Findings – The activity outlined in this article provides an engaging method for interacting with students during one‐shot information literacy workshops. The activity acts as an effective method for obtaining a basic understanding of students' library knowledge. Analyses of the questions collected by the authors suggest that librarians should tailor their workshop content depending on the time of year in which their workshops take place. Originality/value – The activity described in this article is discussed sparingly in the literature. As such, this article outlines best practices for a student‐centered activity that librarians can add to their information literacy toolkit. This article is valuable to librarians with instruction responsibilities.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences
Reference28 articles.
1. Angelo, T.A. and Cross, K.P. (1993), Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers, Jossey‐Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
2. Badke, W.B. (2005), “Can't get no respect: Helping faculty to understand the educational power of information literacy”, Reference Librarian, Vol. 43 Nos 89/90, pp. 63‐80.
3. Bonwell, C.C. and Eison, J.A. (1991), “Active learning: creating excitement in the classroom”, ERIC Digest, ASHE‐ERIC Higher Education Reports, Washington, DC.
4. Chiste, K.B., Glover, A. and Westwood, G. (2000), “Infiltration and entrenchment: capturing and securing information literacy territory in academe”, Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 202‐208.
5. Choinski, E. and Emanuel, M. (2006), “The one‐minute paper and the one‐hour class: outcomes assessment for one‐shot library instruction”, Reference Services Review, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 148‐155.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Exploring motivation: integrating the ARCS model with instruction;Reference Services Review;2017-06-12
2. Historical roles;The Academic Librarian as Blended Professional;2016
3. Practical Tips for Successful One-Shot Instruction;The Fortuitous Teacher;2016
4. Assessing Classroom Dynamics;The Fortuitous Teacher;2016
5. Academic Library Instruction;The Fortuitous Teacher;2016