Abstract
PurposeThe paper aims to study the performance of crowdfunding REITs with respect to traditional REITs in order to evaluate the differences in the risk–return profile and their usefulness for a diversification strategy within the indirect real estate investments.Design/methodology/approachThe paper considers the crowdfunding REITs introduced after the JOBS act in the United States and evaluates their performance and risk during the time period 2016–2018. Performance achieved by crowdfunding REITs is compared with other types of REITs in order to evaluate their usefulness for constructing an optimal portfolio strategy based on a standard mean variance approach.FindingsResults show that the performance of crowdfunding REITs is more stable over time with respect to other REITs and the lack of correlation with traditional REITs may be exploited for constructing a more efficient diversified portfolio of indirect real estate investments.Practical implicationsCrowdfunding REITs have different performance with respect to standard REITs and, especially individual investors, may benefit from including this new investment opportunity in their portfolio.Originality/valueThe paper is the first study on the performance of the crowdfunding REITs that is evaluating their usefulness for a diversification strategy within the real estate sector.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference51 articles.
1. Signaling in equity crowdfunding;Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice,2015
2. Information asymmetry and corporate liquidity management: evidence from real estate investment trusts;The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,2012
3. Entrepreneurial finance and technology transfer;The Journal of Technology Transfer,2016
4. Real estate crowdfunding – modern trend or restructured investment model?: have the SEC's proposed rules on crowdfunding created a closed-market system?;Journal of Business Entrepreneurship and Law,2016
5. Baum (2017), “PropTech 3.0: the future of real estate”, working paper, University of Oxford.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献