Building library collections: it's still about the user

Author:

Stoller Michael

Abstract

PurposeTo address the need for dialogue between librarians, teachers and scholars in research institutions, as the information environment becomes increasingly complex.Design/methodology/approachA discussion of the impact of technology, budgets and collection storage practices on library users and their research patterns; examination of the methodologies for assessing that impact and continuing to meet user needs in a changing environment.FindingsDespite trends toward shared collections and a library of access rather than ownership, it is still necessary to develop careful knowledge of one's patrons and to shape one's collections and services to meet local needs.Practical implicationsLibraries must aggressively use focus groups, surveys and above all the personal relationship between faculty and library subject specialists to shape the development and management of their collections and the services they offer. These methods must shape not only one's title‐by‐title selection but one's larger, policy decisions and the overall configuration of one's collections.Originality/valueA broad assessment of the relationship between the new information landscape and the manner in which librarians and users communicate.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference15 articles.

1. Association of Research Libraries (2003), “ARL statistics: interactive edition”, University of Virginia Library, Charlottesville, VA, available at: http://fisher.lib.virginia.edu/arl/index.html.

2. Okerson, A. and Conway, P. (2001), “BYTES (books you teach every semester)”, Final report to the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, Yale University Library, New Haven, CT, (internal NERL document), available at: www.library.yale.edu/NERL/BYTES/BYTESFinal070401.PDF.

3. Berry, T.U. and Shrode, F.G. (2003), “Cooperative reference and collection development: the science and technology group at the University of Tennessee libraries”, The Reference Librarian, Vol. 40 No. 83/84, pp. 145‐55.

4. Greever, K. (1999), “Building bridges: moving from the back room to the front line librarian‐faculty liaison program at Kenyon College”, Catholic Library World, Vol. 70 No. 1, pp. 23‐6.

5. Hendrix, C. (1999), “Developing a liaison program in a new organizational structure – a work in progress library‐faculty liaison at SUNY Plattsburgh”, The Reference Librarian, Vol. 32 No. 67/68, pp. 203‐24.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Collaborative Collection Building: Greater than the Sum of Its Parts;Journal of Library Resource Sharing;2021-10-20

2. The New Collection Development: Planning and Assessment to Promote Innovation;Where Do We Go From Here? Charleston Conference Proceedings 2015;2016

3. Out of Sight but not Lost to View: Macquarie University Library's Stored Print Collection;Australian Academic & Research Libraries;2013-06

4. Format Preferences of Performing Arts Students;The Journal of Academic Librarianship;2013-05

5. Looking Back, Moving Forward in the Digital Age;Library Resources & Technical Services;2011-09-30

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3