Occupational mobility over the business cycle
Author:
Roosaar Liis,Mõtsmees Pille,Varblane Urmas
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to examine how occupational mobility varies over the business cycle and how selected factors contribute to occupational mobility in different stages of the business cycle.
Design/methodology/approach
– Using annual micro data from the Estonian Labour Force Survey (2001-2010) and implementing probit models with interaction terms, the paper investigates occupational mobility as a change of occupation in two successive years during recovery, boom and recession periods.
Findings
– The analysis indicates that occupational mobility is higher during the recovery and boom periods and lower during the recession stage. The demographic characteristics (gender, marital status, knowledge of local language) influence the probability for occupational change during the recovery stage of the business cycle. The position of employees in the occupational hierarchy is significant during the recovery and boom periods. Employees working in the public sector have a lower probability for occupational change compared with private sector employees during the recession. Training has a positive effect on occupational mobility during recession. Tenure reduces the probability of occupational mobility over the whole business cycle.
Originality/value
– The paper contributes to the literature by providing new results about the role of different factors of occupational mobility over the business cycle. This is among the few studies addressing the variation in the occupational mobility of employees from the public and private sectors. Interactions between the position of the employees in the occupational hierarchy and the ownership form of their employers and the economic sectors add to the understanding about the mechanism of occupational mobility over the business cycle stages.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management
Reference68 articles.
1. Ai, C.R.
and
Norton, E.C.
(2003), “Interaction terms in logit and probit models”, Economics Letters, Vol. 80 No. 1, pp. 123-129. 2. Babecký, J.
,
Du Caju, P.
,
Kosma, T.
,
Lawless, M.
,
Messina, J.
and
Rõõm, T.
(2010), “Downward nominal and real wage rigidity: survey evidence from European firms”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol. 112 No. 4, pp. 884-910. 3. Bachmann, R.
(2005), “Labour market dynamics in Germany: hirings, separations, and job-to-job transitions over the business cycle”, Discussion Paper No. 2005-45, Collaborative Research Center 649, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin. 4. Bachmann, R.
and
Burda, M.
(2010), “Sectoral transformation, turbulence, and labour market dynamics in Germany”, German Economic Review, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 37-59. 5. Balleer, A.
,
Gehrke, B.
,
Lechthaler, W.
and
Merkl, C.
(2013), “Does short-time work save jobs? A business cycle analysis”, IZA Discussion Paper No. 7475, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|