Living a managed community lifestyle: managed community lifestyle from Queensland

Author:

Cradduck Lucy

Abstract

PurposeThe paper aims to improve consumer awareness of the complexities of community living. It does this by clarifying how living in a managed community is different from a “traditional” neighbourhood; and identifying matters that can become disputes.Design/methodology/approachThe paper builds on research by other authors into strata scheme disputes by examining recent Queensland cases.FindingsMany disputes appear to result from a lack of understanding of the complexities of community living. Matters that should be able to be easily resolved are therefore escalated to formal disputes.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper considers law and cases from Queensland. The types of matters considered, however, are relevant for any managed community and therefore the research is relevant for all jurisdictions. The research will be of particular interest to jurisdictions looking to boost living density by increasing the development of managed communities.Practical implicationsThe research will assist in consumer transactions by providing guidance as to the matters to be considering prior to moving into a managed community. More informed decision making by prospective residents will lead to a decreased likelihood of disputes arising.Originality/valueThe paper is an up‐to‐date consideration of the issues arising from community living. It highlights the benefits arising from increased consumer awareness of the complexities of community living and the potential for consumer education to reduce the number of disputes.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Finance

Reference40 articles.

1. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2012), “2011 Census of population and housing”, Australian Bureau of Statistics, available at: www.abs.gov.au (accessed 16 August 2012).

2. Bajracharya, B. and Khan, S. (2010), “Evolving governance model for community building: collaborative partnerships in master planned communities”, Urban Policy and Research, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 471‐485.

3. Blandy, S., Dixon, J. and Dupuis, A. (2006), “Theorising power relationships in multi‐owned residential developments: unpacking the bundle of rights”, Urban Studies, Vol. 43 No. 13, pp. 2365‐2383.

4. Buys, L., Godber, A., Summerville, J. and Barnett, K. (2007), “Building community: collaborative individualism and the challenge for building social capital”, Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 287‐298.

5. Cradduck, L. (2013), “Parking, parties and pets: disputes – the dark side of community living”, Proceedings of the 19th Annual Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference, RMIT, Melbourne, 13‐16 January.

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3