Abstract
Purpose
Despite the constantly increasing number of publications in the field of business ecosystems, there are indications that a precise definition that appropriately captures the business ecosystem mindset is not yet available. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to provide a consensus definition of business ecosystems.
Design/methodology/approach
Using structured content analysis, this paper examines a total of 43 definitions in terms of their core components.
Findings
The results indicate that the existing definitions focus only on single components, e.g. “network of actors,” thereby omitting other essential components, such as “cocreated value proposition” or “shared fate.” Consequently, it seems appropriate to develop a consensus definition that combines the perspectives of the academic and practitioner communities.
Originality/value
The proposed definition is more comprehensive than the prevailing definitions and represents a synthesis of previous considerations on business ecosystems. Such a definition will support researchers in developing a sound business ecosystem theory that will guide practitioners in the efficient design and management of business ecosystems in the long term.
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference72 articles.
1. Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem;Harvard Business Review,2006
2. Ecosystem as structure: an actionable construct for strategy;Journal of Management,2017
3. Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations;Strategic Management Journal,2010
4. Introduction: collaboration and competition in business ecosystems,2013