Abstract
PurposeThis investigation aims to examine the differences and similarities between activity tracking technology users from two regions (the USA and Germany) in their intended privacy-related behavior. The focus lies on data handling after hypothetical discontinuance of use, data protection and privacy policy seeking, and privacy concerns.Design/methodology/approachThe data was collected through an online survey in 2019. In order to identify significant differences between participants from Germany and the USA, the chi-squared test and the Mann–Whitney U test were applied.FindingsThe intensity of several privacy-related concerns was significantly different between the two groups. The majority of the participants did not inform themselves about the respective data privacy policies or terms and conditions before installing an activity tracking application. The majority of the German participants knew that they could request the deletion of all their collected data. In contrast, only 35% out of 68 participants from the US knew about this option.Research limitations/implicationsThis study intends to raise awareness about managing the collected health and fitness data after stopping to use activity tracking technologies. Furthermore, to reduce privacy and security concerns, the involvement of the government, companies and users is necessary to handle and share data more considerably and in a sustainable way.Originality/valueThis study sheds light on users of activity tracking technologies from a broad perspective (here, participants from the USA and Germany). It incorporates not only concerns and the privacy paradox but (intended) user behavior, including seeking information on data protection and privacy policy and handling data after hypothetical discontinuance of use of the technology.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems
Reference56 articles.
1. A review on the state-of-the-art privacy-preserving approaches in the e-health clouds;IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics,2014
2. Information and digital literacies: a review of concepts;Journal of Documentation,2001
3. Case, D.O. and Given, L.M. (Eds) (2016), Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior, 4th ed., Emerald Group Publishing, Howard House, Wagon Lane.
4. Gender and cross-cultural differences in social media disclosures of mental illness,2017
5. Wearable devices in healthcare: privacy and information security issues;Health Information Management Journal,2020
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献