Data privacy-related behavior and concerns of activity tracking technology users from Germany and the USA

Author:

Ilhan AylinORCID,Fietkiewicz Kaja J.

Abstract

PurposeThis investigation aims to examine the differences and similarities between activity tracking technology users from two regions (the USA and Germany) in their intended privacy-related behavior. The focus lies on data handling after hypothetical discontinuance of use, data protection and privacy policy seeking, and privacy concerns.Design/methodology/approachThe data was collected through an online survey in 2019. In order to identify significant differences between participants from Germany and the USA, the chi-squared test and the Mann–Whitney U test were applied.FindingsThe intensity of several privacy-related concerns was significantly different between the two groups. The majority of the participants did not inform themselves about the respective data privacy policies or terms and conditions before installing an activity tracking application. The majority of the German participants knew that they could request the deletion of all their collected data. In contrast, only 35% out of 68 participants from the US knew about this option.Research limitations/implicationsThis study intends to raise awareness about managing the collected health and fitness data after stopping to use activity tracking technologies. Furthermore, to reduce privacy and security concerns, the involvement of the government, companies and users is necessary to handle and share data more considerably and in a sustainable way.Originality/valueThis study sheds light on users of activity tracking technologies from a broad perspective (here, participants from the USA and Germany). It incorporates not only concerns and the privacy paradox but (intended) user behavior, including seeking information on data protection and privacy policy and handling data after hypothetical discontinuance of use of the technology.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference56 articles.

1. A review on the state-of-the-art privacy-preserving approaches in the e-health clouds;IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics,2014

2. Information and digital literacies: a review of concepts;Journal of Documentation,2001

3. Case, D.O. and Given, L.M. (Eds) (2016), Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior, 4th ed., Emerald Group Publishing, Howard House, Wagon Lane.

4. Gender and cross-cultural differences in social media disclosures of mental illness,2017

5. Wearable devices in healthcare: privacy and information security issues;Health Information Management Journal,2020

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Wearable Activity Trackers: A Survey on Utility, Privacy, and Security;ACM Computing Surveys;2024-04-09

2. An In-Depth Analysis of Security and Privacy Concerns in Smart Home IoT Devices Through Expert User Interviews;IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology;2024

3. The Influence of Privacy Concerns on Cryptocurrency Acceptance;IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology;2024

4. Enhancing user awareness on inferences obtained from fitness trackers data;User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction;2023-01-17

5. Modern Dance Virtual Person Tracking Technology Based on AdaBoost Algorithm;2022 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Mobile Networks and Wireless Communications (ICMNWC);2022-12-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3