Strategic predictors of successful enterprise system deployment

Author:

Ettlie John E.,Perotti Victor J.,Joseph Daniel A.,Cotteleer Mark J.

Abstract

PurposeThe delivered wisdom to date has enterprise system purchase and implementation as one of the most hazardous projects any organization can undertake. The aim was to reduce this risk by both theoretically and empirically finding those key predictors of a successful enterprise system deployment.Design/methodology/approachA representative sample of 60 firms drawn from the Fortune 1000 that had recently (1999‐2000) adopted enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems was used to test a model of adoption performance with significant results.FindingsLeadership (social learning theory), business process re‐engineering (change the company not the technology) and acquisition strategy (buy, do not make) were found to be significant predictors of adoption performance (final model R2=43 percent, F=5.5, p<0.001, df=7.52), controlling for industry (manufacturing versus service), project start date and scale (sales). Electronic data interchange (EDI) usage was found to be inversely and significantly related to adoption performance which supports the notion that prior company investments in earlier generations of technology for integration might inhibit adoption of later, more radical or complex alternatives. We validated these results with a focused follow‐up study (2005) using mailed and interview protocols identical to the first questionnaire and 20 new cases of ERP deployment. We found near perfect agreement (p<0.001 binomial test) with our initial findings.Originality/valueThe “four factor” model we validate is a robust predictor of ERP adoption success and can be used by any organization to audit plans and progress for this undertaking.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences

Reference66 articles.

1. Amoako‐Gyampah, K. (2004), “ERP implementation factors: a comparison of managerial and end‐user perspectives”, Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 10 No. 2, p. 171.

2. Angle, H. and Van De Ven, A. (1989), “Suggestions for managing the innovation journey”, in Angle, H., Van de Ven, A. and Poole, M. (Eds), Research on the Management of Innovation, Harper and Row, Ballinger Division, New York, NY, pp. 663‐8.

3. Baker, S. (1998), “SAP's expanding universe”, Business Week, 14 September, p. 168.

4. Bandura, A.H. (1977), Social Learning Theory, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

5. Boudette, N.E. (1999), “SAP acts to head off more system problems”, The Wall Street Journal, Vol. 4, p. A25.

Cited by 34 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3