Organisational adaptation processes to external complexity

Author:

Größler Andreas,Grübner André,Milling Peter M.

Abstract

PurposeBased on a conceptual framework of the linkages between strategic manufacturing goals and complexity, the purpose of this paper is to investigate adaptation processes in manufacturing firms to increasing external complexity.Design/methodology/approachHypotheses are tested with statistical analyses (group comparisons and structural equation models) that are conducted with data from the third round of the International Manufacturing Strategy Survey.FindingsThe study shows that manufacturing firms face different degrees of complexity. Firms in a more complex environment tend to possess a more complex internal structure, as indicated by process configuration, than firms in a less complex environment. Also depending on the degree of complexity, different processes of adaptation to increases in external complexity are initiated by organisations.Research limitations/implicationsResearch studies taking into account the dynamics of adaptation processes would be helpful in order to draw further conclusions, for instance, based on longitudinal analyses or simulation studies.Practical implicationsDepending on the level of complexity a firm has been confronted with in the past, different adaptation processes to further growing complexity can be initiated. Firms in high complexity environments have to re‐configure their strategic goals; firms in low complexity environments have to build‐up internal complexity to cope with demands from the outside.Originality/valueThe paper distinguishes between adaptation processes in low and high complexity environments and provides explanations for the differences.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences

Reference89 articles.

1. Ansoff, H.I. (1965), Corporate Strategy, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY.

2. Argyris, C. and Schön, D.A. (1978), Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA.

3. Argyris, C. and Schön, D.A. (1996), Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA.

4. Ashby, W.R. (1956), An Introduction to Cybernetics, Chapman & Hall, London.

5. Ashby, W.R. (1958), “Requisite variety and implications for control of complex systems”, Cybernetica, Vol. 1, pp. 83‐99.

Cited by 41 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3