Africa’s challenges in the OA movement: risks and possibilities

Author:

Teixeira da Silva Jaime A.,Adjei Kwabena Osei Kuffour,Owusu-Ansah Christopher M.ORCID,Sooryamoorthy Radhamany,Balehegn Mulubrhan

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to assess the status of the open access (OA) movement on the African continent, and if there is any financial or moral exploitation by dominant “foreign” world powers. OA provided the African intellectual community with a tool to prove its academic prowess and an opportunity to display cultural and intellectual independence. OA publishing is prone to abuse, and some in Africa have sought to exploit the OA boom to profit from non-academic activity rather than use this tool to glorify Africa’s image and diversity on the global intellectual stage. These issues are explored in detail in the paper. Design/methodology/approach The authors broadly assessed literature that is related to the growth and challenges associated with OA, including the rise of OA mega journals, in Africa. Findings African OA journals and publishers have to compete with established non-African OA entities. Some are considered “predatory”, but this Jeffrey Beall-based classification may be erroneous. Publishing values that African OA publishers and journals aspire to should not equal those published by non-African publishing entities. Africa should seek solutions to the challenges on that continent via Africa-based OA platforms. The budding African OA movement is applauded, but it must be held as accountable as any other OA journal or publisher. Originality/value African scholars need to reassess the “published in Africa” OA image.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,Information Systems

Reference65 articles.

1. Publishing preferences among academic researchers: implications for academic quality and innovation;Library Philosophy and Practice,2016

2. Threats to the survival of the author-pays-journal to publish model;Publishing Research Quarterly,2017

3. China and India’s economic relations with African countries – neo-colonialism eastern style?;Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies,2015

4. Increased publication in predatory journals by developing countries’ institutions: what it entails? And what can be done?;International Information & Library Review,2017

5. Perceptions, preferences of scholarly publishing in open access routes: a survey of academic librarians in Nigeria;Information and Learning Science,2017

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3