Author:
Zhao Cencheng,Yang Eunhwa,Nie Yiqian,Russo Justin D.
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to provide organizations with a new tool to make decisions related to a facility (building) selection process. Traditionally, value engineering (VE) applies the Value = Function/Cost formula to evaluate the worth of a product. In this paper, the VE-based facility-selection approach is proposed, where the cost of a facility is expressed in net present value (NPV) as it contains the net expense of purchasing or leasing a building as well as the time value of money. Also, a method of quantifying functions and involved risks of different facility choices is proposed.
Design/methodology/approach
The framework of the VE-based facility-selection process is broken down into three steps: preparation, calculation/analysis and assessment. In the latter part of this paper, the authors share a sample analysis by illustrating the analysis and decision-making process when three hypothetical facility-selection options are available.
Findings
The sample analysis indicates that companies can get the lowest cost and risk while improving their functions to achieve the highest value by using the modified VE formula to drive an optimal option for company’s business expansion and facility-selection process.
Originality/value
This paper provides organizations with a strategic system and process to select proper facilities or buildings for business expansion. The VE approach suggested in this study can allow facility/real estate portfolio decision-makers to analyze financial and functional aspects of the facility at the same time and obtain the value coefficient when they choose a new facility from different options. Finally, they can select the best option, which has the highest value coefficient, given financial and functional considerations.
Subject
Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference39 articles.
1. Identification of important factors for office space decision by tenants in Kuala Lumpur City Centre, Malaysia – experts’ view,2010
2. Managing ‘keep’ factors of office tenants to raise satisfaction and loyalty;Property Management,2008
3. The location and site selection decision process: meeting the strategic and tactical needs of the users of corporate real estate;Journal of Corporate Real Estate,2001
4. CBRE (2012), “Lease vs own: no such thing as a ‘one-size-fits-all solution’”, avalible at: www.cbre.ca/AssetLibrary/lease-v-own-article[1]-Copy.pdf
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献