Abstract
PurposeThis study explored the mathematical dispositions of Hong Kong mathematics pre-service teachers (PSTs). It also constructed a mathematical disposition framework comprising their affective, cognitive and functional dispositions towards the subject.Design/methodology/approachThirty-one participants completed three structured metaphor tasks and one open-ended metaphor task in which they shared their views on mathematics. Responses were examined qualitatively and quantitatively. Coding based on thematic analysis was utilized to summarize the specific contents of the mathematical dispositions expressed by the PSTs, and a 5-level scoring scale was employed to evaluate the strength of the dispositions as represented by different metaphor types.FindingsThe findings suggest that the mathematical dispositions of pre-service mathematics teachers were generally positive. However, the overall level was not high. The most prevalent metaphors used to describe mathematics were “rice”, “blue” and “dog”.Research limitations/implicationsHong Kong mathematics PSTs' mathematical dispositions are examined by using metaphorical tasks. Three categories are identified: affective, cognitive and functional dispositions towards mathematics.Originality/valueThis study has proposed an original framework for describing mathematical disposition.
Reference41 articles.
1. When metaphors cross cultures;Journal of Language Teaching and Research,2015
2. Teachers’ narratives: a source for exploring the influences of teachers’ significant life experiences on their dispositions and teaching practices;Teaching and Teacher Education,2018
3. Development and evaluation of an instrument to assess prospective teachers' dispositions with respect to mathematics;International Journal of Business and Social Science,2011
4. Bogen, M. (2007), “In search of that ‘third thing’”, available at: https://www.hepg.org/hel-home/issues/23_4/helarticle/in-search-of-that-third-thing%E2%80%9D_225 (accessed 9 January 2023).
5. Using thematic analysis in psychology;Qualitative Research in Psychology,2006