The clinical governance of multidisciplinary care

Author:

Pearson Ben

Abstract

Purpose Providers of health and social care services aim to deliver personalised care that is safe, effective, caring, responsive and well led. Multidisciplinary teams often have to work together, either within or across multiple provider organisations in order to achieve this aim. It is valuable to have a framework of clinical governance for such circumstances that enables a shared assurance of quality. To achieve these aims, the purpose of this paper is to present a clinical governance matrix framework developed by the author’s experiences in clinical practice, in service change and in management and leadership. Design/methodology/approach There are seven pillars of clinical governance; patient and public involvement, staffing and staff management, clinical effectiveness and research, using information and IT, education and training, risk management and audit. These seven pillars of clinical governance can be mapped against the five quality domains of safe, effective, caring, responsive and well led to create a matrix that in turn describes the framework we need for quality assurance. Findings The matrix is populated with outcome measures and these are monitored to achieve balance across the framework. The tool can be used at the level of an individual practitioner all the way up to multiple organisations in collaboration. The detail in each cell of the matrix will change accordingly and critically should be developed and owned by the subject of the framework. Originality/value This clinical governance matrix is presented as a methodology to monitor quality assurance in the settings of health and social care.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference12 articles.

1. Evaluating safety of tunneled small bore central venous catheters in chronic kidney disease population: a quality improvement initiative;Hemodialysis International,2017

2. Care Quality Commission (2009), “How we inspect and regulate: a guide for providers”, available at: www.cqc.org.uk/content/how-we-inspect-and-regulate-guide-providers#five-key-questions (accessed 20 February 2017).

3. Outcome analysis as a clinical governance tool: experiences with the POSSUM system;Clinical Governance Bulletin,2002

4. Dalton, D. (2014), “Examining new options and opportunities for providers of NHS care”, The Dalton Review, December, pp 17-33, available at: www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/384126/Dalton_Review.pdf (accessed 20 February 2017).

5. Introducing an acute gynaecology dashboard as a new clinical governance tool;Clinical Governance,2013

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3