Website removal from search engines due to copyright violation

Author:

Strzelecki ArturORCID

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to clarify how many removal requests are made, how often, and who makes these requests, as well as which websites are reported to search engines so they can be removed from the search results. Design/methodology/approach Undertakes a deep analysis of more than 3.2bn removed pages from Google’s search results requested by reporting organizations from 2011 to 2018 and over 460m removed pages from Bing’s search results requested by reporting organizations from 2015 to 2017. The paper focuses on pages that belong to the .pl country coded top-level domain (ccTLD). Findings Although the number of requests to remove data from search results has been growing year on year, fewer URLs have been reported in recent years. Some of the requests are, however, unjustified and are rejected by teams representing the search engines. In terms of reporting copyright violations, one company in particular stands out (AudioLock.Net), accounting for 28.1 percent of all reports sent to Google (the top ten companies combined were responsible for 61.3 percent of the total number of reports). Research limitations/implications As not every request can be published, the study is based only what is publicly available. Also, the data assigned to Poland is only based on the ccTLD domain name (.pl); other domain extensions for Polish internet users were not considered. Originality/value This is first global analysis of data from transparency reports published by search engine companies as prior research has been based on specific notices.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference39 articles.

1. Allgrove, B. and Ganley, P. (2007), “Search engines, data aggregators and UK copyright law: a proposal”, working paper, Baker & McKenzie LLP, London, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.961797

2. Google is not fun: an investigation of how Swedish teenagers frame online searching;Journal of Documentation,2017

3. Bifet, A., Castillo, C., Chirita, P.A. and Weber, I. (2005), “An analysis of factors used in search engine ranking”, paper presented at the 1st International Workshop on Adversarial Information Retrieval on the Web (AIRWeb), Chiba, available at: http://airweb.cse.lehigh.edu/2005/bifet.pdf (accessed April 15, 2018).

4. Bridy, A. (2016), “Copyright’s digital deputies: DMCA-Plus enforcement by Internet intermediaries”, in Rothchild, J.A. (Ed.), Research Handbook On Electronic Commerce Law, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, pp. 185-210, available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783479924.00021

5. Fortifying the safe harbors: reevaluating the DMCA in a Web 2.0 world;Berkeley Technology Law Journal,2008

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3